Tools & Wizards About Us
enduringaesthetics.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

enduringaesthetics.com

Enduring Aesthetics | Classic Bodybuilding Motivation

Page Load Speed

8.7 sec in total

First Response

173 ms

Resources Loaded

8.5 sec

Page Rendered

59 ms

enduringaesthetics.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to enduringaesthetics.com homepage info - get ready to check Enduring Aesthetics best content right away, or after learning these important things about enduringaesthetics.com

Classic Bodybuilding Motivation and Inspiration by Enduring Aesthetics. Covering everything Classic Physique of Past and Present.

Visit enduringaesthetics.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Enduringaesthetics.com page load time and found that the first response time was 173 ms and then it took 8.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

enduringaesthetics.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

66/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.0 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,540 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.3 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.enduringaesthetics.com

173 ms

originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js

35 ms

minified.js

43 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

80 ms

polyfill.min.js

7619 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Enduringaesthetics.com, 43% (20 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 26% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.6 sec) relates to the external source Polyfill.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (53%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

937.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Enduringaesthetics.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 858.4 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB
  • After compression 193.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 858.4 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 149.6 kB

  • Original 662.6 kB
  • After minification 513.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Enduring Aesthetics needs image optimization as it can save up to 149.6 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 62.0 kB

  • Original 293.2 kB
  • After minification 293.1 kB
  • After compression 231.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 62.0 kB or 21% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (46%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Enduring Aesthetics. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.enduringaesthetics.com

www.enduringaesthetics.com

173 ms

originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js

originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js

35 ms

minified.js

minified.js

43 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

80 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

7619 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

151 ms

thunderbolt-commons.1e70fbb2.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.1e70fbb2.bundle.min.js

8 ms

main.42e492e1.bundle.min.js

main.42e492e1.bundle.min.js

8 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

6 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

11 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

14 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

11 ms

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

11 ms

8789e7_90cf46523ac04ced9d77fe69bb66d55c~mv2.jpg

8789e7_90cf46523ac04ced9d77fe69bb66d55c~mv2.jpg

283 ms

8789e7_ef2808bce9c042ce83f71a4d40abecda~mv2.jpg

8789e7_ef2808bce9c042ce83f71a4d40abecda~mv2.jpg

473 ms

8789e7_4fcd9d8a89004f6b8aff2a46c5a1862b~mv2.png

8789e7_4fcd9d8a89004f6b8aff2a46c5a1862b~mv2.png

553 ms

8789e7_26ee32a07fa5481db8f81153baf2a6dd~mv2.jpg

8789e7_26ee32a07fa5481db8f81153baf2a6dd~mv2.jpg

405 ms

8789e7_26ee32a07fa5481db8f81153baf2a6dd~mv2.jpg

8789e7_26ee32a07fa5481db8f81153baf2a6dd~mv2.jpg

395 ms

8789e7_ff7aa48e0aee4b88a2681e6fe9d6ed12~mv2.png

8789e7_ff7aa48e0aee4b88a2681e6fe9d6ed12~mv2.png

508 ms

8789e7_099991d37b4c4f42b047e239f36cf8e0~mv2.png

8789e7_099991d37b4c4f42b047e239f36cf8e0~mv2.png

481 ms

8789e7_254008f6eebf41469642fbe84d77283b~mv2.png

8789e7_254008f6eebf41469642fbe84d77283b~mv2.png

644 ms

ironpatern.84ec58ff.png

ironpatern.84ec58ff.png

67 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

69 ms

FD_Udbezj8EHXbdsqLUplxa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff

FD_Udbezj8EHXbdsqLUplxa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff

50 ms

u_mYNr_qYP37m7vgvmIYZxa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff

u_mYNr_qYP37m7vgvmIYZxa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff

74 ms

c81cca03-5f1a-4252-9950-096e60e2bde9.woff

c81cca03-5f1a-4252-9950-096e60e2bde9.woff

74 ms

4021a3b9-f782-438b-aeb4-c008109a8b64.woff

4021a3b9-f782-438b-aeb4-c008109a8b64.woff

67 ms

b56b944e-bbe0-4450-a241-de2125d3e682.woff

b56b944e-bbe0-4450-a241-de2125d3e682.woff

73 ms

6f8d1983-4d34-4fa4-9110-988f6c495757.woff

6f8d1983-4d34-4fa4-9110-988f6c495757.woff

73 ms

file.woff

file.woff

362 ms

130 ms

129 ms

127 ms

132 ms

131 ms

125 ms

126 ms

122 ms

122 ms

128 ms

130 ms

127 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

8 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

23 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

7 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

8 ms

Accessibility Review

enduringaesthetics.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

enduringaesthetics.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

enduringaesthetics.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Enduringaesthetics.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Enduringaesthetics.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

enduringaesthetics.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Enduring Aesthetics. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: