Tools & Wizards About Us
enemylove.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

enemylove.com

Enemy Love: Helping You Learn & Apply Jesus' Peacemaking Approach

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

232 ms

enemylove.com screenshot

About Website

Visit enemylove.com now to see the best up-to-date Enemy Love content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about enemylove.com

Practically useful and biblically faithful content designed to help Christians cultivate God's shalom in places where it's painfully absent.

Visit enemylove.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Enemylove.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

enemylove.com performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

30/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.8 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,060 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.106

88/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.6 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

enemylove.com

1265 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

176 ms

view.css

175 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

174 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

176 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Enemylove.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Enemylove.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (44%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Enemylove.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 1.1 MB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 179.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 48.7 kB

  • Original 869.9 kB
  • After minification 821.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Enemy Love images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 475.9 kB
  • After minification 475.9 kB
  • After compression 473.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 61.3 kB
  • After minification 61.3 kB
  • After compression 58.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Enemylove.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (62%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Enemy Love. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

enemylove.com

enemylove.com

1265 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

176 ms

view.css

view.css

175 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

174 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

176 ms

styles.css

styles.css

174 ms

settings.css

settings.css

204 ms

comment-form.min.css

comment-form.min.css

232 ms

privacy.min.css

privacy.min.css

234 ms

faqs.min.css

faqs.min.css

234 ms

portfolio.min.css

portfolio.min.css

232 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

234 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

261 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

346 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

289 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

345 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

369 ms

css

css

56 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

143 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

171 ms

index.js

index.js

290 ms

index.js

index.js

291 ms

comment_count.js

comment_count.js

299 ms

comment_embed.js

comment_embed.js

300 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

300 ms

api.js

api.js

91 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

299 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

300 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

300 ms

index.js

index.js

300 ms

e-202410.js

e-202410.js

27 ms

e0f0b2ef65362df381d7b1218f452e00.min.js

e0f0b2ef65362df381d7b1218f452e00.min.js

432 ms

EnemyLove-Logo-Dark-Red.png

EnemyLove-Logo-Dark-Red.png

70 ms

Grunge-Texture.jpg

Grunge-Texture.jpg

298 ms

Transparent-Peace-Lamb-Ver-2.png

Transparent-Peace-Lamb-Ver-2.png

297 ms

jesus-on-the-cross-220x135.jpg

jesus-on-the-cross-220x135.jpg

70 ms

Jesus-mercy-220x135.jpg

Jesus-mercy-220x135.jpg

70 ms

Jesus-Messiah-220x135.jpg

Jesus-Messiah-220x135.jpg

141 ms

John-the-Baptist2-220x135.jpg

John-the-Baptist2-220x135.jpg

142 ms

Church-Fathers2-220x135.jpg

Church-Fathers2-220x135.jpg

142 ms

Clement-e1576175631931.jpg

Clement-e1576175631931.jpg

177 ms

EnemyLove-Mini-Logo-Red.png

EnemyLove-Mini-Logo-Red.png

68 ms

Servants-Facebook-Logo-Red.png

Servants-Facebook-Logo-Red.png

139 ms

Servants-Twitter-Red.png

Servants-Twitter-Red.png

175 ms

Contact-Us-Icon-Red.png

Contact-Us-Icon-Red.png

140 ms

awb-icons.woff

awb-icons.woff

104 ms

count.js

count.js

19 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

26 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

60 ms

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

61 ms

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

69 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

58 ms

Accessibility Review

enemylove.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

enemylove.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

enemylove.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Enemylove.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Enemylove.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

enemylove.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Enemy Love. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: