Tools & Wizards About Us
energietarife.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

energietarife.com

Wir vergleichen die Vergleichsportale - Alles auf einen Blick

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

205 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

186 ms

energietarife.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to energietarife.com homepage info - get ready to check Energietarife best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about energietarife.com

Der Vergleich der Vergleichsportale ✓ Preise vergleichen, Angebote, Tests ✓ TÜV-geprüfte Vergleiche und Rechner ✓ Preistrends ✓ Ausgezeichnete Partner

Visit energietarife.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Energietarife.com page load time and found that the first response time was 205 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

energietarife.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

39/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

45/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value340 ms

74/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.088

92/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.9 s

44/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

energietarife.com

205 ms

www.vergleichen.de

946 ms

app.js

235 ms

style.min.css

406 ms

style.css

304 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Energietarife.com, 89% (59 requests) were made to Vergleichen.de and 3% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (946 ms) relates to the external source Vergleichen.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 100.7 kB (7%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Energietarife.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 986.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 68.1 kB

  • Original 84.0 kB
  • After minification 73.5 kB
  • After compression 15.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.5 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 24.7 kB

  • Original 986.9 kB
  • After minification 962.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Energietarife images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 340.4 kB
  • After minification 340.4 kB
  • After compression 338.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 5.8 kB

  • Original 61.7 kB
  • After minification 60.7 kB
  • After compression 55.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Energietarife.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (37%)

Requests Now

62

After Optimization

39

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Energietarife. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

energietarife.com

energietarife.com

205 ms

www.vergleichen.de

www.vergleichen.de

946 ms

app.js

app.js

235 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

406 ms

style.css

style.css

304 ms

style.css

style.css

308 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

322 ms

font-icons.min.css

font-icons.min.css

324 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

347 ms

style.css

style.css

410 ms

masterslider.main.css

masterslider.main.css

418 ms

custom.css

custom.css

432 ms

columns.min.css

columns.min.css

433 ms

sticky.min.css

sticky.min.css

457 ms

menu-logo.min.css

menu-logo.min.css

510 ms

navigation-branding.min.css

navigation-branding.min.css

519 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

627 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

116 ms

jquery.kiss-slider.js

jquery.kiss-slider.js

548 ms

sticky.min.js

sticky.min.js

549 ms

menu.min.js

menu.min.js

562 ms

back-to-top.min.js

back-to-top.min.js

614 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

622 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

700 ms

masterslider.min.js

masterslider.min.js

767 ms

piwik.js

piwik.js

513 ms

vergleichen-logo.png

vergleichen-logo.png

118 ms

vergleichen-logo-mobile.png

vergleichen-logo-mobile.png

117 ms

strom-tarife-vergleich-6895.png

strom-tarife-vergleich-6895.png

210 ms

check24.png

check24.png

116 ms

Verivox.png

Verivox.png

183 ms

preisvergleich-de.png

preisvergleich-de.png

221 ms

gas-tarifvergleich-103829078-1.png

gas-tarifvergleich-103829078-1.png

333 ms

handytarife-vergleich-01653314.png

handytarife-vergleich-01653314.png

334 ms

tariffuxx.png

tariffuxx.png

239 ms

ratenkredit-vergleich-70699889.png

ratenkredit-vergleich-70699889.png

449 ms

finanzcheck.png

finanzcheck.png

332 ms

smava.png

smava.png

333 ms

immobilienkredit-vergleichen-92589314.png

immobilienkredit-vergleichen-92589314.png

554 ms

FMH.png

FMH.png

421 ms

interhyp.png

interhyp.png

428 ms

preisvergleich-73453816.png

preisvergleich-73453816.png

528 ms

idealo.png

idealo.png

432 ms

amazon.png

amazon.png

526 ms

billiger-de.png

billiger-de.png

534 ms

strom.png

strom.png

537 ms

gas.png

gas.png

558 ms

handy.png

handy.png

632 ms

ratenkredit.png

ratenkredit.png

632 ms

hauskredit.png

hauskredit.png

641 ms

preisvergleich.png

preisvergleich.png

641 ms

anbieter-collage.png

anbieter-collage.png

663 ms

label-ausgezeichnete-produkte.png

label-ausgezeichnete-produkte.png

668 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

737 ms

top-bewertet.png

top-bewertet.png

738 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

238 ms

arrow.svg

arrow.svg

672 ms

sky.jpg

sky.jpg

767 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

684 ms

piwik.php

piwik.php

341 ms

loading-2.gif

loading-2.gif

636 ms

light-skin-1.png

light-skin-1.png

665 ms

welt-service.png

welt-service.png

665 ms

fokus-marke.png

fokus-marke.png

677 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

34 ms

ads

ads

30 ms

Accessibility Review

energietarife.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best Practices

energietarife.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

energietarife.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Energietarife.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Energietarife.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

energietarife.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Energietarife. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: