4.7 sec in total
13 ms
4.4 sec
322 ms
Click here to check amazing Energy Care content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about energycare.com
EnergyCare provides guidance and safeguards for all customer contact regulations. We understand the stakes, and we've got you covered.
Visit energycare.comWe analyzed Energycare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 13 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
energycare.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.9 s
0/100
10%
Value12.9 s
0/100
25%
Value18.8 s
0/100
10%
Value1,760 ms
10/100
30%
Value0.026
100/100
15%
Value20.2 s
2/100
10%
13 ms
2342 ms
125 ms
99 ms
163 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Energycare.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Bam.nr-data.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Energycare.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (70%)
2.1 MB
632.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Energycare.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 948.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 71.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Energy Care needs image optimization as it can save up to 21.9 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 547.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 547.5 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 836.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Energycare.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 836.3 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (76%)
66
16
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Energy Care. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
energycare.com
13 ms
www.energycare.com
2342 ms
shadowbox.css
125 ms
extras.css
99 ms
layerslider.css
163 ms
css
18 ms
front-style.css
117 ms
settings.css
98 ms
font-awesome.min.css
174 ms
addthis_wordpress_public.min.css
133 ms
bootstrap.css
221 ms
jquery.mmenu.all.css
247 ms
the-core-style.css
497 ms
style.css
170 ms
prettyPhoto.css
210 ms
animate.css
262 ms
background.css
212 ms
css
29 ms
greensock.js
300 ms
jquery.min.js
327 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
269 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
313 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
303 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
352 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
351 ms
modernizr.min.js
354 ms
bootstrap.min.js
365 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
366 ms
html5shiv.js
388 ms
respond.min.js
391 ms
ce06e10527cfd44890febee82a25c70e.js
374 ms
addthis_widget.js
186 ms
comment-reply.min.js
372 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
376 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-packed.js
409 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
414 ms
jquery.customInput.js
409 ms
scrollTo.min.js
409 ms
jquery.mmenu.min.all.js
422 ms
selectize.min.js
454 ms
jquery.parallax.js
443 ms
effect.min.js
503 ms
lazysizes.min.js
394 ms
general.js
402 ms
core.js
394 ms
transition.js
466 ms
background.js
434 ms
style.css
359 ms
background.init.js
423 ms
fade-slider.js
388 ms
ECARE-R.png
1270 ms
BlueSpruce-RGB-Color.jpg
176 ms
energycaresymbols-03.png
221 ms
energycaresymbols-01.png
205 ms
energycaresymbols-02.png
206 ms
lock-1.png
187 ms
quotes-icon.png
187 ms
trieagle.jpg
221 ms
WEIProMember.png
305 ms
clym.js
168 ms
233338307
262 ms
255978982
412 ms
NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffGjEKI95ZLSZ.woff
161 ms
NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffAzHKI95ZLSZ.woff
169 ms
NaPecZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7fRMfsCoRT.woff
185 ms
NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffBzCKI95ZLSZ.woff
187 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
216 ms
tb.png
83 ms
654640988-017791e889ff3fe4344b53a42f878734c3ca65fd285e75daed30a66afb42733d-d
230 ms
689866857-43bde8912da571d0d030007461554a221e84f39deba40441616dd208bee4b089-d
276 ms
nr-spa-1216.min.js
14 ms
689d5b4562
99 ms
689d5b4562
28 ms
689d5b4562
27 ms
689d5b4562
27 ms
energycare.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
energycare.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
energycare.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Energycare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Energycare.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
energycare.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Energy Care. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: