868 ms in total
38 ms
714 ms
116 ms
Click here to check amazing Energycare content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about energycare.com
In the realm of contact center services, we specialize in enhancing customer experiences through comprehensive solutions. Our integrated approach ensures seamless operations and fosters unparalleled s...
Visit energycare.comWe analyzed Energycare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 38 ms and then it took 830 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
energycare.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
17/100
10%
Value21.9 s
0/100
25%
Value13.5 s
2/100
10%
Value3,870 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.179
68/100
15%
Value22.2 s
1/100
10%
38 ms
83 ms
104 ms
88 ms
101 ms
Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Energycare.com, 44% (15 requests) were made to Images.squarespace-cdn.com and 26% (9 requests) were made to Assets.squarespace.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (287 ms) relates to the external source Images.squarespace-cdn.com.
Page size can be reduced by 529.3 kB (11%)
4.8 MB
4.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Energycare.com main page is 4.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 171.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 171.8 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 323.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Energycare images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 30.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Energycare.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.4 kB or 12% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (47%)
32
17
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Energycare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
energycare.com
38 ms
www.agrgroupinc.com
83 ms
css2
104 ms
legacy.js
88 ms
modern.js
101 ms
extract-css-runtime-d003088ed4dd0a358128-min.en-US.js
98 ms
extract-css-moment-js-vendor-6c569122bfa66a51a056-min.en-US.js
113 ms
cldr-resource-pack-4b37eb27c737844571ba-min.en-US.js
99 ms
common-vendors-stable-9dfa409c7981fdac39f9-min.en-US.js
111 ms
common-vendors-a20d900d730e75998014-min.en-US.js
235 ms
common-3f8e173889b720af8694-min.en-US.js
237 ms
performance-a073777eb82e01935280-min.en-US.js
104 ms
site.css
115 ms
blocking.js
97 ms
static.css
93 ms
site-bundle.e5562d8cebebf31a1b8d2827a15e7331.js
93 ms
plugin-lightbox.css
19 ms
plugin-lightbox.js
18 ms
clym.js
90 ms
AGR+Group+Logo+Color+Registered.png
92 ms
AGR+Group+Logo+WHite+Registered.png
29 ms
IMG_6323.jpg
34 ms
Contact+Center+1.jpg
159 ms
dreamstime_m_201801287.jpeg
34 ms
Asset+17.png
31 ms
Screen+Shot+2024-03-12+at+11.37.52+AM.png
37 ms
Screen+Shot+2024-03-12+at+11.38.06+AM.png
38 ms
mitigate+risk.png
36 ms
team+icon.png
249 ms
time+zone+icon.png
40 ms
scalability.png
38 ms
L+dreamstime_m_201801287.jpg
41 ms
AGR+Group+Logo+Color+Registered.png
41 ms
download.png
287 ms
energycare.com accessibility score
energycare.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
energycare.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Energycare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Energycare.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
energycare.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Energycare. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: