Tools & Wizards About Us
energywatchgroup.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

energywatchgroup.org

Energy Watch Group

Page Load Speed

9.1 sec in total

First Response

3.1 sec

Resources Loaded

5.7 sec

Page Rendered

333 ms

energywatchgroup.org screenshot

About Website

Visit energywatchgroup.org now to see the best up-to-date Energy Watch Group content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about energywatchgroup.org

Visit energywatchgroup.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Energywatchgroup.org page load time and found that the first response time was 3.1 sec and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

energywatchgroup.org performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.7 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value150 ms

94/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.159

73/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.3 s

25/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

3059 ms

style.min.css

560 ms

cookieblocker.min.css

285 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

311 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

310 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Energywatchgroup.org and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Energywatchgroup.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (59%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

824.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Energywatchgroup.org main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 664.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 103.9 kB

  • Original 132.3 kB
  • After minification 129.5 kB
  • After compression 28.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 103.9 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 54.6 kB

  • Original 568.8 kB
  • After minification 514.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Energy Watch Group images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 453.3 kB

  • Original 635.0 kB
  • After minification 635.0 kB
  • After compression 181.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 453.3 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 563.9 kB

  • Original 664.4 kB
  • After minification 654.7 kB
  • After compression 100.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Energywatchgroup.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 563.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (52%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Energy Watch Group. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

3059 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

560 ms

cookieblocker.min.css

cookieblocker.min.css

285 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

311 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

310 ms

avia-merged-styles-8aefa2d08d1365b7db1f76b231a33a05---66913c544d19f.css

avia-merged-styles-8aefa2d08d1365b7db1f76b231a33a05---66913c544d19f.css

821 ms

post-206.css

post-206.css

369 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

567 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

414 ms

timeme.min.js

timeme.min.js

414 ms

avia-head-scripts-867a964dbe66b53cd399d8a1283e2281---66913b6c87331.js

avia-head-scripts-867a964dbe66b53cd399d8a1283e2281---66913b6c87331.js

468 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

342 ms

burst-cookieless.min.js

burst-cookieless.min.js

439 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

483 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

447 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

480 ms

complianz.min.js

complianz.min.js

489 ms

avia-footer-scripts-75da44c2c1d15a813008f4b5762686df---66913c5611170.js

avia-footer-scripts-75da44c2c1d15a813008f4b5762686df---66913c5611170.js

758 ms

PM_Muhanad_Al_Halak_Wasserkraft_2024_07_05-260x185.jpg

PM_Muhanad_Al_Halak_Wasserkraft_2024_07_05-260x185.jpg

125 ms

Bildschirmfoto-2024-07-04-um-17.36.50-260x185.png

Bildschirmfoto-2024-07-04-um-17.36.50-260x185.png

126 ms

SNEC-Preisverleihung-e1718177712555-260x185.jpg

SNEC-Preisverleihung-e1718177712555-260x185.jpg

126 ms

Mailchimp-Header-260x185.png

Mailchimp-Header-260x185.png

125 ms

NL-Maerz-2024-260x185.png

NL-Maerz-2024-260x185.png

208 ms

Mailchimp-Header-2-260x185.png

Mailchimp-Header-2-260x185.png

232 ms

654620f7f091335e74d0b209_ewg_guardian-p-500-249x300.jpg

654620f7f091335e74d0b209_ewg_guardian-p-500-249x300.jpg

294 ms

6519944d763c14eba43f72d6_ewg_iea_critic-p-500-300x131.png

6519944d763c14eba43f72d6_ewg_iea_critic-p-500-300x131.png

322 ms

651996a242ecd9f2cda23ef4_study_screenshot-222-p-500-300x292.jpg

651996a242ecd9f2cda23ef4_study_screenshot-222-p-500-300x292.jpg

228 ms

65199d45a21c1be2dddf6429_solarenergie_v1-300x208.jpg

65199d45a21c1be2dddf6429_solarenergie_v1-300x208.jpg

283 ms

ewg_logo_23down-w.svg

ewg_logo_23down-w.svg

315 ms

801761414-300x169.jpeg

801761414-300x169.jpeg

286 ms

opensans-variablefont_wdth,wght.ttf

opensans-variablefont_wdth,wght.ttf

478 ms

entypo-fontello.woff

entypo-fontello.woff

338 ms

opensans-italic-variablefont_wdth,wght.ttf

opensans-italic-variablefont_wdth,wght.ttf

556 ms

Accessibility Review

energywatchgroup.org accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

energywatchgroup.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

energywatchgroup.org SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Energywatchgroup.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Energywatchgroup.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

energywatchgroup.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Energy Watch Group. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: