Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    65% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

engi.eu

Nidos in Europe

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

414 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

770 ms

engi.eu screenshot

About Website

Welcome to engi.eu homepage info - get ready to check Engi best content right away, or after learning these important things about engi.eu

Visit engi.eu

Key Findings

We analyzed Engi.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 414 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

engi.eu performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value480 ms

60/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.076

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.6 s

47/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

engi.eu

414 ms

engi.eu

427 ms

nidosineurope.eu

937 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

115 ms

style.min.css

213 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Engi.eu, 74% (26 requests) were made to Nidosineurope.eu and 11% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (937 ms) relates to the external source Nidosineurope.eu.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 438.7 kB (77%)

Content Size

567.7 kB

After Optimization

129.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Engi.eu main page is 567.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 346.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 20.7 kB

  • Original 27.3 kB
  • After minification 26.6 kB
  • After compression 6.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.7 kB or 76% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 122.1 kB

  • Original 193.8 kB
  • After minification 179.9 kB
  • After compression 71.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 122.1 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 295.9 kB

  • Original 346.6 kB
  • After minification 284.2 kB
  • After compression 50.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Engi.eu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 295.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (74%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

7

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Engi. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

engi.eu accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

engi.eu best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

engi.eu SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Engi.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Engi.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Engi. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: