Access engineeringtracks.com. EngineeringTracks

engineeringtracks.com screenshot

2

Performance

Renders faster than
20% of other websites
70

Accessibility

Visual factors better than
that of 35% of websites
58

Best Practices

More advanced features
available than in
20% of websites
77

SEO

Google-friendlier than
36% of websites

First Response

98 ms

Resources Loaded

30.4 sec

Page Rendered

3 sec

engineeringtracks.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Engineering Tracks content for Saudi Arabia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about engineeringtracks.com

Visit engineeringtracks.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Engineeringtracks.com page load time and found that the first response time was 98 ms and then it took 33.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value11.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value27.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value58.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,470 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.537

14/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value148.8 s

0/100

10%

engineeringtracks.com

98 ms

engineering-tracks.com

3907 ms

bootstrap.min.css

227 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

114 ms

animate.min.css

189 ms

Our browser made a total of 182 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Engineeringtracks.com, 97% (177 requests) were made to Engineering-tracks.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Cdn.birdseed.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (11.1 sec) relates to the external source Engineering-tracks.com.

Content Size

27.5 MB

After Optimization

25.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Engineeringtracks.com main page is 27.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 26.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-93%

Potential reduce by 270.2 kB

Original 290.9 kB
After minification 137.0 kB
After compression 20.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 153.9 kB, which is 53% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 270.2 kB or 93% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 622.3 kB

Original 26.2 MB
After minification 25.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Engineering Tracks images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 266.3 kB

Original 460.0 kB
After minification 449.7 kB
After compression 193.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 266.3 kB or 58% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 481.6 kB

Original 566.6 kB
After minification 505.5 kB
After compression 84.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Engineeringtracks.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 481.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Now

168

After Optimization

135

The browser has sent 168 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Engineering Tracks. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

Search Engine Optimization Advices

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

ZX
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Engineeringtracks.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Engineeringtracks.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

engineeringtracks.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Engineering Tracks. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: