5.3 sec in total
141 ms
4.3 sec
895 ms
Click here to check amazing Engle Lane content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about englelane.org
Visit englelane.orgWe analyzed Englelane.org page load time and found that the first response time was 141 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
englelane.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
37/100
10%
Value6.1 s
12/100
25%
Value9.2 s
13/100
10%
Value350 ms
73/100
30%
Value0.016
100/100
15%
Value9.6 s
29/100
10%
141 ms
3068 ms
17 ms
18 ms
249 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Englelane.org, 28% (23 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 12% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Englelane.org.
Page size can be reduced by 339.6 kB (8%)
4.2 MB
3.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Englelane.org main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 170.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 170.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Engle Lane images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 140.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 140.6 kB or 36% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Englelane.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.9 kB or 20% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (61%)
67
26
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Engle Lane. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
englelane.org
141 ms
englelane.org
3068 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
17 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
18 ms
utilities.css
249 ms
general.css
187 ms
style.min.css
133 ms
css
32 ms
style.css
65 ms
jetpack.css
2 ms
main.css
116 ms
main.css
132 ms
main-media-query.css
185 ms
animations.css
186 ms
utilities.js
190 ms
jquery.min.js
7 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
7 ms
functions.js
202 ms
popper-1.16.1.min.js
203 ms
tippy-5.2.1.min.js
261 ms
et-core-unified-44.min.css
232 ms
animate.css
204 ms
magnific-popup.css
204 ms
style.css
207 ms
style.css
227 ms
style.css
271 ms
scripts.min.js
451 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
276 ms
jquery.mobile.js
275 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
279 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
288 ms
main.js
340 ms
common.js
342 ms
e-202437.js
12 ms
main.js
345 ms
actual.min.js
396 ms
jquery.exitintent.min.js
406 ms
public.min.js
406 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
409 ms
jquery.throttle.debounce.min.js
415 ms
magnific-popup.min.js
461 ms
masonry.pkgd.min.js
473 ms
custom.js
469 ms
sticky-elements.js
570 ms
ELT-LOGO-2.png
703 ms
Four-Broads-Poster.png
36 ms
et-divi-dynamic-tb-90-tb-1376176-44-late.css
297 ms
ELT-2024.png
34 ms
ELT-Alice.jpg
32 ms
1963.jpg
39 ms
ELT-Hairspray.jpg
33 ms
ELT-Hairspray1.jpg
34 ms
AdamsFamily.jpg
36 ms
ELT-LesMis3.jpg
34 ms
ELT-LesMis.jpg
35 ms
ELT-LesMis2.jpg
37 ms
1964.jpg
39 ms
ThatsEntertainment.jpg
40 ms
ELT-LionKingJr.jpg
41 ms
1960.jpg
43 ms
ELT-SisterAct.jpg
42 ms
MusicMan.jpg
45 ms
CTIWY.jpg
76 ms
GrumpyThumb.png
47 ms
MatildaThumb.png
46 ms
JosephThumb.png
47 ms
NewsiesThumb.png
47 ms
FourThumb.png
49 ms
FrankenThumb.png
48 ms
modules.woff
156 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7myRJTVPNI4un_HKCEk.woff
22 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7myjJTVPNI4un_HKCEk.woff
30 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mz9JTVPNI4un_HKCEk.woff
76 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mwjJTVPNI4un_HKCEk.woff
317 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7myjJDVPNI4un_HKCEk.woff
316 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mx9IjVPNI4un_HKCEk.woff
154 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mxEIjVPNI4un_HKCEk.woff
58 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mwjIjVPNI4un_HKCEk.woff
50 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mwKIjVPNI4un_HKCEk.woff
176 ms
daaDSSYiLGqEal3MvdA_FOL_3FkN6zn0b-NBYTQ.woff
59 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
155 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
75 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
188 ms
englelane.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
englelane.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
englelane.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Englelane.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Englelane.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
englelane.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Engle Lane. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: