Tools & Wizards About Us
englewoodreview.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 88

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

englewoodreview.org

The Englewood Review of Books - Theology News & Book Reviews for Christian Readers

Page Load Speed

270 ms in total

First Response

84 ms

Resources Loaded

186 ms

Page Rendered

0 ms

englewoodreview.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to englewoodreview.org homepage info - get ready to check Englewood Review best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about englewoodreview.org

The Englewood Review of Books - Christian Book Reviews and Book News for socially-engaged readers: Theology - Community - Imagination - Reconciliation

Visit englewoodreview.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Englewoodreview.org page load time and found that the first response time was 84 ms and then it took 186 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

englewoodreview.org performance score

88

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

88/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

88/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value200 ms

89/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.113

86/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.3 s

84/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

englewoodreview.org

84 ms

englewoodreview.org

66 ms

api.js

35 ms

Our browser made a total of 3 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Englewoodreview.org, 33% (1 request) were made to Recaptcha.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (84 ms) belongs to the original domain Englewoodreview.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 885.5 kB (46%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Englewoodreview.org main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls within a big category (top 100 000) of medium weight web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 808.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-54%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 1.9 kB
  • After minification 1.8 kB
  • After compression 867 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.0 kB or 54% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 43.9 kB

  • Original 765.4 kB
  • After minification 721.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Englewood Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 546.7 kB

  • Original 808.3 kB
  • After minification 801.0 kB
  • After compression 261.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 546.7 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 293.9 kB

  • Original 340.1 kB
  • After minification 308.6 kB
  • After compression 46.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Englewoodreview.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 293.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Englewood Review. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

englewoodreview.org

englewoodreview.org

84 ms

englewoodreview.org

englewoodreview.org

66 ms

api.js

api.js

35 ms

Accessibility Review

englewoodreview.org accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

englewoodreview.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

englewoodreview.org SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Englewoodreview.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Englewoodreview.org main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

englewoodreview.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Englewood Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: