270 ms in total
84 ms
186 ms
0 ms
Welcome to englewoodreview.org homepage info - get ready to check Englewood Review best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about englewoodreview.org
The Englewood Review of Books - Christian Book Reviews and Book News for socially-engaged readers: Theology - Community - Imagination - Reconciliation
Visit englewoodreview.orgWe analyzed Englewoodreview.org page load time and found that the first response time was 84 ms and then it took 186 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
englewoodreview.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
88/100
10%
Value2.6 s
88/100
25%
Value3.2 s
92/100
10%
Value200 ms
89/100
30%
Value0.113
86/100
15%
Value4.3 s
84/100
10%
84 ms
66 ms
35 ms
Our browser made a total of 3 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Englewoodreview.org, 33% (1 request) were made to Recaptcha.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (84 ms) belongs to the original domain Englewoodreview.org.
Page size can be reduced by 899.9 kB (47%)
1.9 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Englewoodreview.org main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls within a big category (top 100 000) of medium weight web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 822.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 1.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.0 kB or 54% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 43.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Englewood Review images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 561.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 561.1 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 293.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Englewoodreview.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 293.9 kB or 86% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
1
1
The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Englewood Review. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
englewoodreview.org
84 ms
englewoodreview.org
66 ms
api.js
35 ms
englewoodreview.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
englewoodreview.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
englewoodreview.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
WINDOWS-1252
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Englewoodreview.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Englewoodreview.org main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
englewoodreview.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Englewood Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: