3.1 sec in total
16 ms
2.3 sec
736 ms
Click here to check amazing Eniceco content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about eniceco.com
At Intelblast we are offering a wide range of specialized cleaning technologies that requires a high level of know-how and expertise.
Visit eniceco.comWe analyzed Eniceco.com page load time and found that the first response time was 16 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
eniceco.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
26/100
10%
Value14.8 s
0/100
25%
Value10.2 s
8/100
10%
Value1,610 ms
12/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value16.0 s
6/100
10%
16 ms
708 ms
92 ms
180 ms
268 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Eniceco.com, 86% (72 requests) were made to Intelblast.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (759 ms) relates to the external source Intelblast.com.
Page size can be reduced by 195.2 kB (9%)
2.3 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Eniceco.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 113.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 113.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 56.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Eniceco images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 4.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 20.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eniceco.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 20.1 kB or 14% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (58%)
73
31
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eniceco. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
eniceco.com
16 ms
intelblast.com
708 ms
style.min.css
92 ms
styles.css
180 ms
ctf-styles.min.css
268 ms
css
45 ms
themify-icons.min.css
271 ms
dflip.min.css
273 ms
style.min.css
370 ms
avalion.css
277 ms
avalion-mbl.css
281 ms
Defaults.css
355 ms
style.min.css
361 ms
ib2-style.min.css
363 ms
creative-link.min.css
397 ms
twentytwenty.css
399 ms
bafg-style.css
442 ms
jquery.min.js
455 ms
ultimate-params.min.js
455 ms
jquery-appear.min.js
472 ms
custom.min.js
471 ms
creative-link.min.js
476 ms
jquery.event.move.js
529 ms
jquery.twentytwenty.js
541 ms
js
114 ms
css
44 ms
rs6.css
621 ms
index.js
622 ms
index.js
623 ms
rbtools.min.js
687 ms
rs6.min.js
719 ms
us.core.min.js
681 ms
dflip.min.js
684 ms
new-tab.js
683 ms
api.js
55 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
685 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
737 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
759 ms
index.js
737 ms
bafg-custom-js.js
759 ms
phone.svg
212 ms
Intelblast-DryIce-logo.png
302 ms
es.svg
303 ms
de.svg
305 ms
it.svg
306 ms
Hd.png
529 ms
dummy.png
312 ms
link-btm.png
379 ms
Intelblast-IBLMINI.png
380 ms
Intelblast-IBL2500.png
380 ms
Intelblast-IBL3000.png
528 ms
Intelblast-PELLETIZER.png
411 ms
5YearWarranty-ExtendedWarranty.jpg
433 ms
Intelblast-Nozzles-Accessories.jpg
592 ms
check.png
486 ms
Industry-TireMolds.jpg
528 ms
Industry-Galvanization.jpg
529 ms
Industry-ShoeMolds.jpg
591 ms
Buses-Trains-Planes.jpg
593 ms
Industry-BakeriesFood.jpg
592 ms
Industry-WelldingCells-Robots.jpg
593 ms
Industry-PlasticInjection.jpg
605 ms
Industry-FireRestoration.jpg
555 ms
Industry-HoldRemediation.jpg
557 ms
info.png
597 ms
Glue-applicator-before.jpg
630 ms
Glue-applicator-after.jpg
641 ms
placeholder.svg
554 ms
1705309479481-150x150.jpg
580 ms
toRight-icon.png
671 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
35 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
49 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
70 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
107 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
109 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf
109 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
707 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
606 ms
Arrowimg-Icon.svg
617 ms
Intelblast-5BenefitsCleaning.jpg
756 ms
toRight-iconW.svg
632 ms
LinkedinIcon.png
618 ms
material-icons.woff
679 ms
recaptcha__en.js
76 ms
eniceco.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
eniceco.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
eniceco.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eniceco.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Eniceco.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eniceco.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Eniceco. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: