1.5 sec in total
276 ms
1.1 sec
73 ms
Visit enlog.us now to see the best up-to-date ENLOG content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about enlog.us
ENLOG is a worldwide sales company devoted to the Photovoltaic Industry since 1995. We offer essential Materials and Machinery for the production of pv modules
Visit enlog.usWe analyzed Enlog.us page load time and found that the first response time was 276 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
enlog.us performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
81/100
10%
Value6.0 s
13/100
25%
Value5.1 s
61/100
10%
Value940 ms
29/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value12.8 s
13/100
10%
276 ms
49 ms
50 ms
50 ms
41 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Enlog.us, 41% (16 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 31% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (436 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 280.2 kB (47%)
602.2 kB
322.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Enlog.us main page is 602.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 362.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 277.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 277.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ENLOG images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (31%)
35
24
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ENLOG. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.enlog.us
276 ms
originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js
49 ms
minified.js
50 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
50 ms
polyfill.min.js
41 ms
thunderbolt-commons.24e46262.bundle.min.js
138 ms
main.8752ee81.bundle.min.js
143 ms
lodash.min.js
136 ms
react.production.min.js
139 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
143 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
125 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
148 ms
e8f91e_cd9a3b3d30794bd3bd1586b587992af1~mv2.jpg
75 ms
bundle.min.js
75 ms
e8f91e_3755707435274cb18f193a65bafaf306f000.jpg
54 ms
e8f91e_ac6bdfa646df4edebed412594f625b67~mv2.jpg
54 ms
e8f91e_367b43f53fcb41b7985bcc095b22ecb8~mv2.jpg
53 ms
e8f91e_921a061ca07547bbb1323b3253d784a5~mv2.jpg
53 ms
e8f91e_8b7c0c312909408cb20606d3e5808773~mv2.jpg
436 ms
e8f91e_8b7c0c312909408cb20606d3e5808773~mv2.jpg
54 ms
112 ms
132 ms
136 ms
124 ms
124 ms
123 ms
147 ms
165 ms
166 ms
162 ms
160 ms
176 ms
cca525a8-ad89-43ae-aced-bcb49fb271dc.woff
14 ms
03805817-4611-4dbc-8c65-0f73031c3973.woff
13 ms
80c34ad2-27c2-4d99-90fa-985fd64ab81a.woff
13 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
6 ms
bolt-performance
26 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
10 ms
right-arrow.svg
10 ms
enlog.us accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
enlog.us best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
enlog.us SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Enlog.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Enlog.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
enlog.us
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of ENLOG. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: