Tools & Wizards About Us
enota.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

enota.com

Enota – Explore, play, fish, tube, hike, learn, and discover magic right now!

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

1 sec

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

enota.com screenshot

About Website

Visit enota.com now to see the best up-to-date Enota content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about enota.com

Visit enota.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Enota.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

enota.com performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.3 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.5 s

24/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.enota.com

1022 ms

all.css

57 ms

font-awesome.min.css

32 ms

fonts.css

87 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

90 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Enota.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Pro.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Enota.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 655.6 kB (10%)

Content Size

6.7 MB

After Optimization

6.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Enota.com main page is 6.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 6.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 35.1 kB

  • Original 44.4 kB
  • After minification 37.8 kB
  • After compression 9.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.6 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 616.1 kB

  • Original 6.4 MB
  • After minification 5.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Enota images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 3.9 kB

  • Original 145.9 kB
  • After minification 145.9 kB
  • After compression 142.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 513 B

  • Original 75.5 kB
  • After minification 75.4 kB
  • After compression 75.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Enota.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (37%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

33

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Enota. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.enota.com

www.enota.com

1022 ms

all.css

all.css

57 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

32 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

87 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

90 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

95 ms

slick.css

slick.css

89 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

86 ms

style.css

style.css

89 ms

styles.css

styles.css

91 ms

front.min.css

front.min.css

92 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

136 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

93 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

93 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

164 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

172 ms

rezstreamloader

rezstreamloader

51 ms

slick.js

slick.js

131 ms

custom.js

custom.js

123 ms

index.js

index.js

123 ms

index.js

index.js

163 ms

www.rezstream.com

www.rezstream.com

594 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

82 ms

css2

css2

40 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

126 ms

hero.jpg

hero.jpg

553 ms

image1.jpg

image1.jpg

253 ms

ajax-loader-bar.gif

ajax-loader-bar.gif

39 ms

pattern.png

pattern.png

223 ms

image2.jpg

image2.jpg

131 ms

image3.jpg

image3.jpg

176 ms

image4.jpg

image4.jpg

197 ms

image5.jpg

image5.jpg

182 ms

image6.jpg

image6.jpg

300 ms

image7.jpg

image7.jpg

226 ms

image8.jpg

image8.jpg

233 ms

image9.jpg

image9.jpg

314 ms

image10.jpg

image10.jpg

261 ms

image11.jpg

image11.jpg

274 ms

image12.jpg

image12.jpg

343 ms

image13.jpg

image13.jpg

311 ms

image14.jpg

image14.jpg

345 ms

image15.jpg

image15.jpg

342 ms

image17.jpg

image17.jpg

344 ms

image18.jpg

image18.jpg

436 ms

image16.jpg

image16.jpg

549 ms

bg.png

bg.png

371 ms

bg2.png

bg2.png

373 ms

icon1.svg

icon1.svg

374 ms

icon2.svg

icon2.svg

399 ms

icon3.svg

icon3.svg

402 ms

icon4.svg

icon4.svg

404 ms

vEFV2_5QCwIS4_Dhez5jcVBp.ttf

vEFV2_5QCwIS4_Dhez5jcVBp.ttf

17 ms

vEFI2_5QCwIS4_Dhez5jcWjVamgc.ttf

vEFI2_5QCwIS4_Dhez5jcWjVamgc.ttf

70 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

419 ms

prev.svg

prev.svg

29 ms

next.svg

next.svg

30 ms

Accessibility Review

enota.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

ARIA toggle fields do not have accessible names

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

enota.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

enota.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    US-ASCII

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Enota.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Enota.com main page’s claimed encoding is us-ascii. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

enota.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Enota. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: