Tools & Wizards About Us
enrag.at screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

enrag.at

Enrag - Verfahrenstechnik, Simulation, Software Entwicklun

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

616 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

198 ms

enrag.at screenshot

About Website

Visit enrag.at now to see the best up-to-date Enrag content for Austria and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about enrag.at

Seit 2010 bieten wir unseren Kunden maßgeschneiderte Softwareentwicklung und digitales Engineering in den Bereichen Thermodynamik und Verfahrenstechnik sowie

Visit enrag.at

Key Findings

We analyzed Enrag.at page load time and found that the first response time was 616 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

enrag.at performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

29/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value880 ms

32/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.532

14/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.0 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

616 ms

css

26 ms

style.css

198 ms

flexslider.css

216 ms

widget.css

216 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Enrag.at, 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Enrag.at.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 52.7 kB (2%)

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

3.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Enrag.at main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 23.1 kB

  • Original 29.1 kB
  • After minification 25.2 kB
  • After compression 6.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.8 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 9.3 kB

  • Original 3.1 MB
  • After minification 3.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Enrag images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 20.3 kB

  • Original 24.8 kB
  • After minification 16.7 kB
  • After compression 4.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Enrag.at needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 20.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (17%)

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Enrag. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

616 ms

css

css

26 ms

style.css

style.css

198 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

216 ms

widget.css

widget.css

216 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

320 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

215 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

217 ms

widget.js

widget.js

399 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

217 ms

Menu_Transparent.png

Menu_Transparent.png

102 ms

ENRAG_LOGO.png

ENRAG_LOGO.png

196 ms

Bild1_1920x410.jpg

Bild1_1920x410.jpg

1008 ms

Bild2_1920x410.jpg

Bild2_1920x410.jpg

1093 ms

Bild3_1920x410.jpg

Bild3_1920x410.jpg

1101 ms

Bild4_1920x410.jpg

Bild4_1920x410.jpg

1013 ms

Fluidization4-00000002-97x150.gif

Fluidization4-00000002-97x150.gif

300 ms

ENRAG_LOGO.png

ENRAG_LOGO.png

390 ms

Header_Overlay.png

Header_Overlay.png

473 ms

Widget_Header.png

Widget_Header.png

568 ms

Footer_Overlay.png

Footer_Overlay.png

667 ms

CynthoPro-Regular.otf

CynthoPro-Regular.otf

949 ms

CynthoPro-Bold.otf

CynthoPro-Bold.otf

1058 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

28 ms

piwik.js

piwik.js

690 ms

bg_direction_nav.png

bg_direction_nav.png

1116 ms

Accessibility Review

enrag.at accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

enrag.at best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

enrag.at SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Enrag.at can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Enrag.at main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

enrag.at

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Enrag. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: