Report Summary

  • 91

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

ental.com

ental.com

Page Load Speed

16.7 sec in total

First Response

668 ms

Resources Loaded

15.8 sec

Page Rendered

168 ms

ental.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ental content for South Korea. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ental.com

Forsale Lander

Visit ental.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ental.com page load time and found that the first response time was 668 ms and then it took 16 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ental.com performance score

91

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

79/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.014

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.1 s

95/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ental.com

668 ms

index.html

3877 ms

all2.css

1418 ms

bondisk.css

825 ms

style.css

414 ms

Our browser made a total of 117 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ental.com, 79% (93 requests) were made to Webimg.bondisk.com and 10% (12 requests) were made to Bondisk.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.7 sec) relates to the external source Bimage.bondisk.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 787.7 kB (34%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Ental.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 280.2 kB

  • Original 308.0 kB
  • After minification 258.5 kB
  • After compression 27.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 49.5 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 280.2 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 38.4 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ental images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 357.5 kB

  • Original 455.0 kB
  • After minification 299.2 kB
  • After compression 97.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 357.5 kB or 79% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 111.6 kB

  • Original 125.4 kB
  • After minification 122.9 kB
  • After compression 13.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ental.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 111.6 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (9%)

Requests Now

114

After Optimization

104

The browser has sent 114 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ental. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

ental.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

ental.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

ental.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    EUC-KR

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ental.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ental.com main page’s claimed encoding is euc-kr. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ental. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: