Tools & Wizards About Us
entravel.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

entravel.ru

Дешевый семейный отдых с детьми:Россия,Тайланд Европа, Турция, Египет, горящие туры цены путевки на двоих все включено, лето, зима, весна, осень, купи...

Page Load Speed

22.1 sec in total

First Response

603 ms

Resources Loaded

21.2 sec

Page Rendered

354 ms

entravel.ru screenshot

About Website

Visit entravel.ru now to see the best up-to-date Entravel content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about entravel.ru

Семейный отдых с детьми : дешевые горящие туры и путевки на двоих в любой сезон: лето, зима, весна, осень,цены,туроператора бронирование

Visit entravel.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Entravel.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 603 ms and then it took 21.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

entravel.ru performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

96/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

75/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

80/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value430 ms

64/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.445

20/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.4 s

59/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

entravel.ru

603 ms

style.css

142 ms

style.css

279 ms

style.css

279 ms

style.css

277 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Entravel.ru, 10% (3 requests) were made to Royalmedgroup.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Counter.rambler.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.8 sec) relates to the external source Hit27.hotlog.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 170.1 kB (40%)

Content Size

429.2 kB

After Optimization

259.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Entravel.ru main page is 429.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 242.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 40.1 kB

  • Original 46.9 kB
  • After minification 26.5 kB
  • After compression 6.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.4 kB, which is 44% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 36.9 kB

  • Original 242.6 kB
  • After minification 205.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Entravel needs image optimization as it can save up to 36.9 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 91.3 kB

  • Original 131.4 kB
  • After minification 131.4 kB
  • After compression 40.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 91.3 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 8.2 kB
  • After minification 8.1 kB
  • After compression 6.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Entravel.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.8 kB or 22% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (17%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

19

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Entravel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

entravel.ru

entravel.ru

603 ms

style.css

style.css

142 ms

style.css

style.css

279 ms

style.css

style.css

279 ms

style.css

style.css

277 ms

styles.css

styles.css

284 ms

loader.min.js

loader.min.js

728 ms

script.js

script.js

281 ms

counter_cv.js

counter_cv.js

193 ms

top100.jcn

top100.jcn

369 ms

watch.js

watch.js

14 ms

zzvok1.png

zzvok1.png

548 ms

in.png

in.png

436 ms

banner-88x31-rambler-gray2.gif

banner-88x31-rambler-gray2.gif

482 ms

spa.png

spa.png

459 ms

wup.png

wup.png

459 ms

bg_form.png

bg_form.png

417 ms

zapros_tour.png

zapros_tour.png

418 ms

body.gif

body.gif

423 ms

bezbolk.jpg

bezbolk.jpg

423 ms

pustota.png

pustota.png

138 ms

left_menu_bg.gif

left_menu_bg.gif

139 ms

vip.png

vip.png

139 ms

top100.jcn

top100.jcn

884 ms

img_h4.png

img_h4.png

143 ms

niz.jpg

niz.jpg

564 ms

count

count

19803 ms

banner-88x31-rambler-gray2.gif

banner-88x31-rambler-gray2.gif

122 ms

hit

hit

257 ms

hit

hit

518 ms

counter2

counter2

281 ms

Accessibility Review

entravel.ru accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

entravel.ru best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

entravel.ru SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1251

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Entravel.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Entravel.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

entravel.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Entravel. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: