11.7 sec in total
2 sec
7.9 sec
1.8 sec
Visit entrofeed.com now to see the best up-to-date Entrofeed content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about entrofeed.com
CidukJP | Ciduk JP menjadi salah satu situs game online resmi di jagat raya saat ini. Dengan ratusan game dengan yang kemenangan tertinggi yang memastikan pemain setia atau pun baru CidukJP mendapatka...
Visit entrofeed.comWe analyzed Entrofeed.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2 sec and then it took 9.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
entrofeed.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
10/100
10%
Value6.1 s
12/100
25%
Value12.6 s
3/100
10%
Value1,830 ms
9/100
30%
Value0.38
27/100
15%
Value17.3 s
4/100
10%
2047 ms
74 ms
418 ms
955 ms
709 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Entrofeed.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Collect-v6.51.la. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Entrofeed.com.
Page size can be reduced by 148.4 kB (68%)
216.9 kB
68.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Entrofeed.com main page is 216.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 173.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 147.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 147.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Entrofeed images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 587 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (39%)
61
37
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Entrofeed. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
entrofeed.com
2047 ms
js-sdk-pro.min.js
74 ms
js.js
418 ms
app-min.css
955 ms
woocommerce-min.css
709 ms
fontello.css
453 ms
style.css
470 ms
dynamic-style.css
518 ms
style.min.css
878 ms
frontend.min.css
708 ms
tablepress-combined.min.css
712 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
771 ms
frontend-legacy.min.css
947 ms
frontend.min.css
970 ms
post-8580.css
951 ms
post-76.css
1021 ms
dashicons.min.css
1336 ms
display-structure.css
1238 ms
pum-site-styles.css
1239 ms
css
34 ms
css
51 ms
fontawesome.min.css
2275 ms
solid.min.css
1240 ms
collect
892 ms
hm.js
1096 ms
push.js
1528 ms
animations.min.css
1049 ms
haha.js
1176 ms
logo-dark.png.jpg
1019 ms
logo-light.png
1016 ms
wpc-decking-3-1-1024x890.jpg
1559 ms
capped-Decking.jpg
1151 ms
WPC-Decking.jpg
1425 ms
Fencing-2.jpg
1241 ms
WPC-Planter-Pots-2-150x150.jpg
1259 ms
Decking-Tiles-1.jpg
1375 ms
Commercial-300x188.jpg
1468 ms
Front-Porch-decking-Ideas-300x188.jpg
1502 ms
Wpc-Decking-for-Corridor-300x188.jpg
1598 ms
wpc-decking-for-garden-300x188.jpg
1651 ms
composite-fencing-3-300x188.jpg
1701 ms
decking-for-front-porches-300x188.jpg
1737 ms
Front-Porch-Composite-Decking-300x188.jpg
1805 ms
collect
453 ms
collect
452 ms
collect
554 ms
Outdoor-wpc-fence-panels-300x188.jpg
1796 ms
Outdoor-WPC-Fence-sale-300x188.jpg
1983 ms
pool-2-300x188.jpg
1981 ms
wpc-decking-for-Fashion-shop-300x188.jpg
1928 ms
WPC-decking-for-Library-300x188.jpg
1766 ms
Composite-Patio-WPC-Decking-Flooring-Tiles-695x435.jpg
1966 ms
Composite-Deck-Stairs-695x435.jpg
2019 ms
Composite-Roof-Top-Fence-Deck-695x435.jpg
1977 ms
Commercial-Composite-Fencing-Company-695x435.jpg
2009 ms
logo-footer-167x40.png
1723 ms
weixin.png
1765 ms
Does-composite-decking-expand-and-contract-60x60.jpg
1931 ms
What-is-composite-decking-made-of-60x60.jpg
1926 ms
Can-You-Paint-Composite-Decking-60x60.jpg
1935 ms
hm.gif
308 ms
logo-dark.png-83x20.jpg
1718 ms
Wood-Plastic-Composite-Decking-banner1.jpg-1920%C3%97600.jpg
1945 ms
Wood-Plastic-Composite-Decking-banner2.jpg-1920%C3%97800.jpg
2325 ms
Wood-Plastic-Composite-Decking-banner3.jpg-1920%C3%97800.jpg
2706 ms
map.png
196 ms
rtui.woff
1204 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
27 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
73 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
98 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
96 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
97 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
98 ms
rtui.ttf
1003 ms
rtui.svg
1327 ms
entrofeed.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
entrofeed.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
entrofeed.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
ZH
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Entrofeed.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Chinese. Our system also found out that Entrofeed.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
entrofeed.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Entrofeed. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: