6.7 sec in total
784 ms
5 sec
920 ms
Click here to check amazing Enviroscreen content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about enviroscreen.org.uk
When you contract Enviroscreen for any type of shading, screening or tracking system, you can be sure that we’ll give you the exceptional service you require.
Visit enviroscreen.org.ukWe analyzed Enviroscreen.org.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 784 ms and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
enviroscreen.org.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.1 s
1/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value10.7 s
7/100
10%
Value720 ms
41/100
30%
Value0.113
86/100
15%
Value12.1 s
16/100
10%
784 ms
113 ms
155 ms
34 ms
38 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Enviroscreen.org.uk, 15% (6 requests) were made to C0.wp.com and 10% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (896 ms) belongs to the original domain Enviroscreen.org.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (50%)
2.3 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Enviroscreen.org.uk main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 873.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 168.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 168.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Enviroscreen images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 304.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 304.8 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 680.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Enviroscreen.org.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 680.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (74%)
35
9
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Enviroscreen. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.enviroscreen.org.uk
784 ms
js
113 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
155 ms
style.min.css
34 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
38 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
36 ms
classic-themes.min.css
37 ms
cb2r8.css
244 ms
5qoj2.css
414 ms
5qoj2.css
896 ms
jetpack.css
8 ms
hfywc.css
352 ms
css
89 ms
4m63t.js
269 ms
hfywc.js
537 ms
classic-10_7.css
92 ms
mc-validate.js
98 ms
bxxil.css
458 ms
image-cdn.js
355 ms
index.js
436 ms
index.js
445 ms
navigation.min.js
499 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
523 ms
e-202407.js
86 ms
jquery.min.js
7 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
534 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
548 ms
js
85 ms
Hero-image-case-study2.jpg
397 ms
homepage-slider-fabric2.jpg
389 ms
homepage-slider-qwickcube4.jpg
117 ms
homepage-slider-blindbox2.jpg
395 ms
homepage-slider-antiligature3.jpg
477 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
44 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
44 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf
72 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf
73 ms
cropped-enviroscreen-logo-transparent-copy.png
228 ms
asset_composer.js
200 ms
Logos.jpg
203 ms
enviroscreen.org.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
enviroscreen.org.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
enviroscreen.org.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Enviroscreen.org.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Enviroscreen.org.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
enviroscreen.org.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Enviroscreen. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: