Tools & Wizards About Us
envizi.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

envizi.com

ESG Software | IBM Envizi ESG Suite

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

37 ms

Resources Loaded

866 ms

Page Rendered

194 ms

envizi.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Envizi content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about envizi.com

ESG software to support GHG calculations, ESG and sustainability reporting all in one ESG software platform.

Visit envizi.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Envizi.com page load time and found that the first response time was 37 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

envizi.com performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value24.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value13,400 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.994

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value56.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

envizi.com

37 ms

envizi

294 ms

launch-560e54b3e83c.min.js

22 ms

loader.js

85 ms

clientlib-idlStylesCarbon.lc-4bcd71d5119ddf067401538b806d7bbb-lc.min.css

42 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Envizi.com, 77% (56 requests) were made to 1.www.s81c.com and 19% (14 requests) were made to Ibm.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (323 ms) relates to the external source Ibm.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (70%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

605.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Envizi.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 135.2 kB

  • Original 157.7 kB
  • After minification 137.2 kB
  • After compression 22.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.5 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 135.2 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 7.3 kB

  • Original 94.6 kB
  • After minification 87.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Envizi images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 1.3 MB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB
  • After compression 488.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 8.4 kB
  • After minification 8.3 kB
  • After compression 6.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Envizi.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.6 kB or 19% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (94%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Envizi. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 47 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

envizi.com

envizi.com

37 ms

envizi

envizi

294 ms

launch-560e54b3e83c.min.js

launch-560e54b3e83c.min.js

22 ms

loader.js

loader.js

85 ms

clientlib-idlStylesCarbon.lc-4bcd71d5119ddf067401538b806d7bbb-lc.min.css

clientlib-idlStylesCarbon.lc-4bcd71d5119ddf067401538b806d7bbb-lc.min.css

42 ms

clientlib-idlStyles.lc-e1f324f0c29c4588f3c8c8d210a6cb91-lc.min.css

clientlib-idlStyles.lc-e1f324f0c29c4588f3c8c8d210a6cb91-lc.min.css

48 ms

plex.css

plex.css

77 ms

sans.css

sans.css

81 ms

clientlib-pdfviewer.lc-c79c6cf22a5b660f493131a4be3ded5f-lc.min.css

clientlib-pdfviewer.lc-c79c6cf22a5b660f493131a4be3ded5f-lc.min.css

69 ms

masthead.min.js

masthead.min.js

82 ms

clientlib-idlBundle.lc-2afd79fa944130608b59c23b36700691-lc.min.js

clientlib-idlBundle.lc-2afd79fa944130608b59c23b36700691-lc.min.js

71 ms

clientlib-target-antiflicker.lc-36a1efb28e947b5873f4a28c2cf9d5eb-lc.min.js

clientlib-target-antiflicker.lc-36a1efb28e947b5873f4a28c2cf9d5eb-lc.min.js

43 ms

clientlib-idlStyles.lc-5438d9525e70c590d9fa030037353ee6-lc.min.js

clientlib-idlStyles.lc-5438d9525e70c590d9fa030037353ee6-lc.min.js

60 ms

cm-app.min.js

cm-app.min.js

234 ms

tag.min.js

tag.min.js

80 ms

code-snippet.min.js

code-snippet.min.js

80 ms

leadspace.min.js

leadspace.min.js

233 ms

content-block-horizontal.min.js

content-block-horizontal.min.js

80 ms

content-item-horizontal.min.js

content-item-horizontal.min.js

234 ms

table-of-contents.min.js

table-of-contents.min.js

235 ms

tag-group.min.js

tag-group.min.js

233 ms

content-section.min.js

content-section.min.js

233 ms

content-group-heading.js

content-group-heading.js

233 ms

content-block-cards.min.js

content-block-cards.min.js

237 ms

cta-block.min.js

cta-block.min.js

233 ms

content-group.min.js

content-group.min.js

234 ms

background-media.min.js

background-media.min.js

235 ms

footer.min.js

footer.min.js

235 ms

tabs-extended-media.min.js

tabs-extended-media.min.js

236 ms

card-group.min.js

card-group.min.js

236 ms

image.min.js

image.min.js

239 ms

text-cta.js

text-cta.js

236 ms

content-block.min.js

content-block.min.js

237 ms

link-list.min.js

link-list.min.js

238 ms

link-list-item-cta.js

link-list-item-cta.js

237 ms

video-player.min.js

video-player.min.js

238 ms

button-group.min.js

button-group.min.js

237 ms

card-cta-footer.js

card-cta-footer.js

238 ms

content-item.min.js

content-item.min.js

236 ms

carousel.min.js

carousel.min.js

239 ms

button-cta.js

button-cta.js

244 ms

content-block-segmented.min.js

content-block-segmented.min.js

238 ms

horizontal-rule.min.js

horizontal-rule.min.js

243 ms

lightbox-video-player.min.js

lightbox-video-player.min.js

239 ms

video-cta-container.min.js

video-cta-container.min.js

242 ms

countdown.min.js

countdown.min.js

239 ms

paragraph.min.js

paragraph.min.js

239 ms

clientlib-pdfviewer.lc-e4412705ab74ab8b0e2e21371e0762c9-lc.min.js

clientlib-pdfviewer.lc-e4412705ab74ab8b0e2e21371e0762c9-lc.min.js

66 ms

LAoB

LAoB

54 ms

LWxX

LWxX

64 ms

WF0o

WF0o

70 ms

breadcrumb.min.js

breadcrumb.min.js

171 ms

star-rating.min.js

star-rating.min.js

168 ms

promo-banner.min.js

promo-banner.min.js

166 ms

ibm-common.js

ibm-common.js

167 ms

leadspace_copy

leadspace_copy

323 ms

IBMPlexSans-Text.woff

IBMPlexSans-Text.woff

31 ms

IBMPlexSans-Regular.woff

IBMPlexSans-Regular.woff

67 ms

IBMPlexSans-Medium.woff

IBMPlexSans-Medium.woff

66 ms

IBMPlexSans-Light.woff

IBMPlexSans-Light.woff

5 ms

IBMPlexSans-ExtraLight.woff

IBMPlexSans-ExtraLight.woff

61 ms

IBMPlexSans-Thin.woff

IBMPlexSans-Thin.woff

66 ms

IBMPlexSans-SemiBold.woff

IBMPlexSans-SemiBold.woff

29 ms

IBMPlexSans-Bold.woff

IBMPlexSans-Bold.woff

98 ms

ffc8ae5d07a2166e6af1.ttf

ffc8ae5d07a2166e6af1.ttf

29 ms

IBMPlexSans-TextItalic.woff

IBMPlexSans-TextItalic.woff

61 ms

IBMPlexSans-Italic.woff

IBMPlexSans-Italic.woff

61 ms

IBMPlexSans-MediumItalic.woff

IBMPlexSans-MediumItalic.woff

96 ms

IBMPlexSans-LightItalic.woff

IBMPlexSans-LightItalic.woff

96 ms

IBMPlexSans-ExtraLightItalic.woff

IBMPlexSans-ExtraLightItalic.woff

97 ms

IBMPlexSans-ThinItalic.woff

IBMPlexSans-ThinItalic.woff

133 ms

IBMPlexSans-SemiBoldItalic.woff

IBMPlexSans-SemiBoldItalic.woff

100 ms

IBMPlexSans-BoldItalic.woff

IBMPlexSans-BoldItalic.woff

95 ms

Accessibility Review

envizi.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[role]s do not have all required [aria-*] attributes

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

envizi.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

envizi.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Envizi.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Envizi.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

envizi.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Envizi. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: