3 sec in total
29 ms
2.2 sec
713 ms
Visit eoption.com now to see the best up-to-date EOption content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about eoption.com
Open a brokerage account with eOption today. $0 Stock & ETF Trades. Robust Trading Platform with powerful tools. Power trading app to trade anywhere.
Visit eoption.comWe analyzed Eoption.com page load time and found that the first response time was 29 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
eoption.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
37/100
10%
Value11.7 s
0/100
25%
Value13.2 s
2/100
10%
Value1,770 ms
10/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value59.8 s
0/100
10%
29 ms
591 ms
64 ms
60 ms
45 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Eoption.com, 8% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (779 ms) belongs to the original domain Eoption.com.
Page size can be reduced by 191.3 kB (68%)
279.7 kB
88.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Eoption.com main page is 279.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 238.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 191.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 191.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EOption images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 68 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (68%)
78
25
The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EOption. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
eoption.com
29 ms
www.eoption.com
591 ms
style.min.css
64 ms
superfly-menu.css
60 ms
styles.css
45 ms
wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css
67 ms
lity.min.css
66 ms
mfb.min.css
68 ms
ionicons.min.css
70 ms
renew.css
78 ms
style.css
75 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
73 ms
moonrayJS-only-wp-forms.css
70 ms
moonray.css
85 ms
jquery-ui.css
83 ms
jquery.min.js
90 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
88 ms
tracking.js
88 ms
md5.js
88 ms
util.js
87 ms
superfly-menu.js
88 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
87 ms
api.js
87 ms
css
86 ms
hustle-icons.min.css
91 ms
hustle-global.min.css
97 ms
hustle-info.min.css
98 ms
hustle-popup.min.css
90 ms
css
69 ms
cs-classic.1b5b576.js
390 ms
index.js
93 ms
index.js
98 ms
wpcf7r-fe.js
98 ms
gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js
391 ms
hustle-ui.min.js
390 ms
underscore.min.js
392 ms
front.min.js
390 ms
eoption-calc.js
391 ms
lity.min.js
394 ms
x.js
390 ms
api.js
388 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
390 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
388 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
360 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
343 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
338 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
339 ms
index.js
340 ms
css
37 ms
fbevents.js
491 ms
gtm.js
561 ms
en_badge_web_generic.png
535 ms
eoption-logo.png
347 ms
eOPTION-banner-with-layer-2_01.jpg
348 ms
businessman-relaxing-idyllic-palm-fringed-beach-45322948-copy-2-1.png
349 ms
eOption-2.png
347 ms
eOption-Home-Trade-Platform2.png
350 ms
THE-TOKENIST-copy-1.png
346 ms
investopedia-logo-vector-removebg-preview.png
350 ms
TT_Icon-_-Logo.png
350 ms
download__1_-removebg-preview-1.png
350 ms
investormint-logo.png
349 ms
05xPZC5vwaIMcpgpjf3J1vi-11.1569472235.fit_scale.size_1028x578-removebg-preview-1-e1602251323812.png
402 ms
eoption_devices.png
422 ms
eoption_laptops.png
421 ms
jfjfjfjf.png
422 ms
My-Sequence-1.gif
779 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWCWtFCc.woff
280 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHw3q5d0.woff
281 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
277 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
441 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3iu4nwlxdo3cOWxw.woff
416 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlxdo3cOWxw.woff
443 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7jujVj9w.woff
443 ms
yMJMMIlzdpvBhQQL_SC3X9yhF25-T1ny_CmBoWg1fDAlp4ln.woff
443 ms
yMJMMIlzdpvBhQQL_SC3X9yhF25-T1nyGy6BoWg1fDAlp4ln.woff
443 ms
icomoon.svg
234 ms
en_badge_web_generic.png
168 ms
analytics.js
171 ms
js
119 ms
uwt.js
171 ms
bat.js
196 ms
linkid.js
18 ms
collect
20 ms
collect
39 ms
js
44 ms
adsct
257 ms
adsct
235 ms
ga-audiences
19 ms
track.php
302 ms
eoption.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
eoption.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
eoption.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eoption.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eoption.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eoption.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of EOption. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: