14 sec in total
3.2 sec
10.6 sec
176 ms
Welcome to epack.co.nz homepage info - get ready to check EPack best content right away, or after learning these important things about epack.co.nz
EPACKAGING SHOP IS A LEADING DISTRIBUTOR OF INDUSTRIAL PACKAGING AND CONSUMABLES IN NEW ZEALAND.
Visit epack.co.nzWe analyzed Epack.co.nz page load time and found that the first response time was 3.2 sec and then it took 10.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
epack.co.nz performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.8 s
0/100
10%
Value10.3 s
0/100
25%
Value12.7 s
3/100
10%
Value90 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.076
95/100
15%
Value10.6 s
23/100
10%
3225 ms
239 ms
962 ms
942 ms
946 ms
Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (81 requests) were addressed to the original Epack.co.nz, 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Epack.co.nz.
Page size can be reduced by 148.5 kB (14%)
1.1 MB
946.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Epack.co.nz main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 504.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 69.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EPack images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 38.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 38.6 kB or 11% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Epack.co.nz needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 20.6 kB or 15% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (77%)
83
19
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EPack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 54 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
epack.co.nz
3225 ms
4ac71b4101a9ba0036b864ca6e32e7bf.css
239 ms
6b77daa2ea89e66797dabfa8c4e9d3b3.css
962 ms
prototype.js
942 ms
jquery.min.js
946 ms
conflict.js
715 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.16.custom.min.js
1198 ms
jquery.cookie.js
769 ms
bootstrap.min.js
956 ms
ccard.js
1023 ms
validation.js
1180 ms
builder.js
1181 ms
effects.js
1195 ms
dragdrop.js
1211 ms
controls.js
1276 ms
slider.js
1415 ms
js.js
1418 ms
form.js
1435 ms
menu.js
1437 ms
translate.js
1435 ms
cookies.js
1529 ms
calendar.js
1650 ms
calendar-setup.js
1654 ms
jquery.transition.js
1674 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1672 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js
1677 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
1783 ms
holder.min.js
1886 ms
animate.min.js
1890 ms
jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js
1908 ms
menu.js
1916 ms
countdown.js
2036 ms
raphael-min.js
2124 ms
venusslider.pack.js
2128 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
2145 ms
font-awesome.min.css
34 ms
css
22 ms
css
39 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
2149 ms
touchSwipe.min.js
1916 ms
common.js
1577 ms
tabs.js
1594 ms
modernizr.custom.min.js
1424 ms
selectivizr.js
1441 ms
matchMedia.js
1438 ms
matchMedia.addListener.js
1386 ms
enquire.js
1523 ms
app.js
1420 ms
imagesloaded.js
1421 ms
stripe_payments.js
1429 ms
cctype.js
1421 ms
express.js
1426 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
1523 ms
common.js
1418 ms
ddscrollspy.js
1421 ms
floor-panel.js
1427 ms
perfect-scrollbar.min.js
1437 ms
common.js
1440 ms
fix-skin.js
1173 ms
ga.js
40 ms
fbevents.js
40 ms
274 ms
logo.png
264 ms
menu_item_left_1.jpg
483 ms
menu_item_left_2.png
264 ms
menu_item_left_3.jpg
265 ms
menu_item_left_4.jpg
265 ms
menu_item_left_5.jpg
479 ms
menu_item_left_6.jpg
481 ms
menu_item_left_7.jpg
487 ms
menu_item_left_8.jpg
513 ms
Banner1.jpg
510 ms
Banner2.jpg
949 ms
Banne1.jpg
952 ms
e100c-c_3_1_1_.jpg
722 ms
standard_gauge.jpg
727 ms
80_mirons_1.png
749 ms
w3007_2.jpg
766 ms
o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyD9A-9a6Vc.ttf
18 ms
o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyAaBO9a6Vc.ttf
18 ms
Material-Design-Iconic-Font.woff
1412 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
66 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1180 ms
icon_minicart.png
960 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
KFOOCniXp96a4Tc2DaTeuDAoKsE617JFc49knOIYdjTYdaIcKWmT.ttf
6 ms
KFOOCniXp96a4Tc2DaTeuDAoKsE617JFc49knOIYdjTYkqUcKWmT.ttf
18 ms
large_left.png
886 ms
large_right.png
1053 ms
rating-blank-star.png
1045 ms
rating-full-star.png
1081 ms
epack.co.nz
2869 ms
95beea4a4bb686bbba15c0d10ec4615b.css
239 ms
epack.co.nz accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
epack.co.nz best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
epack.co.nz SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Epack.co.nz can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Epack.co.nz main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
epack.co.nz
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of EPack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: