Tools & Wizards About Us
epam-group.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

epam-group.ru

EPAM | Enterprise Software Development, Design & Consulting

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

108 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

704 ms

epam-group.ru screenshot

About Website

Visit epam-group.ru now to see the best up-to-date EPAM Group content for Ukraine and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about epam-group.ru

Since 1993, we've helped customers digitally transform their businesses through our unique blend of world-class software engineering, design and consulting services.

Visit epam-group.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Epam-group.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 108 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

epam-group.ru performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.6 s

17/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,520 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.015

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.5 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

epam-group.ru

108 ms

www.epam-group.ru

138 ms

www.epam-group.ru

641 ms

epam-core.common.min.12868.css

28 ms

epam-core.all-components.min.12868.css

77 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Epam-group.ru, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (641 ms) belongs to the original domain Epam-group.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (34%)

Content Size

4.6 MB

After Optimization

3.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Epam-group.ru main page is 4.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 90.2 kB

  • Original 102.5 kB
  • After minification 58.9 kB
  • After compression 12.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 43.6 kB, which is 43% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.2 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 60.3 kB

  • Original 2.6 MB
  • After minification 2.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EPAM Group images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 959.0 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 400.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 959.0 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 424.9 kB

  • Original 480.2 kB
  • After minification 475.9 kB
  • After compression 55.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Epam-group.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 424.9 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (20%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

43

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EPAM Group. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

epam-group.ru

epam-group.ru

108 ms

www.epam-group.ru

www.epam-group.ru

138 ms

www.epam-group.ru

www.epam-group.ru

641 ms

epam-core.common.min.12868.css

epam-core.common.min.12868.css

28 ms

epam-core.all-components.min.12868.css

epam-core.all-components.min.12868.css

77 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

42 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

65 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

40 ms

granite.min.js

granite.min.js

42 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

42 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

56 ms

epam-core.common.min.12868.js

epam-core.common.min.12868.js

152 ms

epam-core.all-components.min.12868.js

epam-core.all-components.min.12868.js

126 ms

shared.min.js

shared.min.js

54 ms

epam-core.dust.min.12868.js

epam-core.dust.min.12868.js

124 ms

epam-com.dust.min.12868.js

epam-com.dust.min.12868.js

123 ms

pattern.png

pattern.png

140 ms

logo_gray-blue_80px.svg

logo_gray-blue_80px.svg

65 ms

facebook-icon.png

facebook-icon.png

66 ms

twitter-icon.png

twitter-icon.png

66 ms

VK%201.png

VK%201.png

66 ms

linkedin-icon.png

linkedin-icon.png

63 ms

Core_Product__Coding.svg

Core_Product__Coding.svg

131 ms

AdvancedTech__Advanced_tech.svg

AdvancedTech__Advanced_tech.svg

129 ms

__business_intelligent.svg

__business_intelligent.svg

131 ms

DE__Digital_Engagement.svg

DE__Digital_Engagement.svg

133 ms

Financial_services.svg

Financial_services.svg

134 ms

ins%202x.svg

ins%202x.svg

141 ms

Software_Tech.svg

Software_Tech.svg

138 ms

Media.svg

Media.svg

145 ms

Life_Science-Healthcare.svg

Life_Science-Healthcare.svg

141 ms

Emerging_Verticals.svg

Emerging_Verticals.svg

135 ms

Commerce.svg

Commerce.svg

142 ms

Travel.svg

Travel.svg

147 ms

Energy.svg

Energy.svg

144 ms

Valentin_Perov_Software_Engineer.jpg

Valentin_Perov_Software_Engineer.jpg

168 ms

Tatsiana_Karaka_Sr_App_Support_Analyst.JPG

Tatsiana_Karaka_Sr_App_Support_Analyst.JPG

149 ms

Dmitry_Bakhanovich_Software_Engineer.JPG

Dmitry_Bakhanovich_Software_Engineer.JPG

149 ms

Robin_Smith_Senior_Director_Client_Engagement.jpg

Robin_Smith_Senior_Director_Client_Engagement.jpg

172 ms

Myles_Bunbury_Delivery_Director.jpg

Myles_Bunbury_Delivery_Director.jpg

166 ms

Regina_Viadro_Senior_Director_Account_Management.JPG

Regina_Viadro_Senior_Director_Account_Management.JPG

167 ms

mvideo_monitor.png

mvideo_monitor.png

404 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

145 ms

sprite_2.svg

sprite_2.svg

129 ms

arrow-icon-right.svg

arrow-icon-right.svg

125 ms

pattern_large.png

pattern_large.png

130 ms

news.svg

news.svg

128 ms

sourcesanspro-regular.woff

sourcesanspro-regular.woff

254 ms

oswald-bold.ttf

oswald-bold.ttf

199 ms

sourcesanspro-bold.woff

sourcesanspro-bold.woff

198 ms

oswald-regular.ttf

oswald-regular.ttf

196 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

223 ms

watch.js

watch.js

163 ms

image.jpg

image.jpg

104 ms

image.jpg

image.jpg

141 ms

image.jpg

image.jpg

73 ms

image.jpg

image.jpg

72 ms

image.jpg

image.jpg

69 ms

image.jpg

image.jpg

67 ms

image.jpg

image.jpg

80 ms

image.jpg

image.jpg

84 ms

collect

collect

15 ms

collect

collect

73 ms

Accessibility Review

epam-group.ru accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

epam-group.ru best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

epam-group.ru SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Epam-group.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Epam-group.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

epam-group.ru

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of EPAM Group. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: