4.9 sec in total
444 ms
4.3 sec
204 ms
Welcome to epanel.pl homepage info - get ready to check EPanel best content for Poland right away, or after learning these important things about epanel.pl
ePanel.pl
Visit epanel.plWe analyzed Epanel.pl page load time and found that the first response time was 444 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
epanel.pl performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
33/100
10%
Value7.6 s
3/100
25%
Value5.4 s
57/100
10%
Value480 ms
60/100
30%
Value0.206
60/100
15%
Value6.8 s
55/100
10%
444 ms
918 ms
330 ms
876 ms
336 ms
Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Epanel.pl, 17% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Epanel.pl.
Page size can be reduced by 118.4 kB (28%)
421.9 kB
303.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Epanel.pl main page is 421.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 226.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 8.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.3 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.3 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EPanel images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 90.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 90.6 kB or 53% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Epanel.pl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.9 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (23%)
22
17
The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EPanel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
epanel.pl
444 ms
epanel.pl
918 ms
style.css
330 ms
jquery.js
876 ms
script.js
336 ms
wp-embed.min.js
336 ms
css
59 ms
editor-style.css
337 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
391 ms
analytics.js
56 ms
b.jpg
345 ms
logo.png
344 ms
fill.png
345 ms
menu.jpg
347 ms
slajd1-1400x491.jpg
1126 ms
slajd2-1400x491.jpg
1225 ms
shadow.png
684 ms
register.png
682 ms
information.png
679 ms
right.png
721 ms
mspanel-icon.png
1004 ms
7XUFZ5tgS-tD6QamInJTcV7rzNbpW6Nj2hg-a3CqQCw.ttf
63 ms
anMUvcNT0H1YN4FII8wpr_t8AhW9B6lv6sS0b9ZUs4M.ttf
76 ms
anMUvcNT0H1YN4FII8wpryxUgDq5QQvPlW0B9Pr_rX4.ttf
87 ms
anMUvcNT0H1YN4FII8wpr4188wSa-Rs9YVTVrhJjUsU.ttf
103 ms
anMUvcNT0H1YN4FII8wpr2-3NvDdcn-JtPTQTxuKc-Y.ttf
102 ms
collect
12 ms
ga.js
65 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
epanel.pl accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
epanel.pl best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
epanel.pl SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
PL
PL
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Epanel.pl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Polish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Epanel.pl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
epanel.pl
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of EPanel. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: