Tools & Wizards About Us
epercut.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    21% of websites

epercut.com

Creation site internet Clermont Ferrand Auvergne – Agence Web Clermont

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

278 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

229 ms

epercut.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Epercut content for France. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about epercut.com

Vous recherchez une agence Web innovante? epercut est une agence dynamique pour vous accompagner tout au long de votre projet web : création site internet, référencement, création graphique (logo, fly...

Visit epercut.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Epercut.com page load time and found that the first response time was 278 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

epercut.com performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.5 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.5 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value310 ms

77/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.117

85/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.4 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

epercut.com

278 ms

www.epercut.com

377 ms

style.css

147 ms

voile.css

217 ms

apple_menu.css

218 ms

Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Epercut.com, 7% (6 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (916 ms) belongs to the original domain Epercut.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 232.8 kB (22%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

803.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Epercut.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 622.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 48.5 kB

  • Original 61.0 kB
  • After minification 60.6 kB
  • After compression 12.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.5 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 37.6 kB

  • Original 622.0 kB
  • After minification 584.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Epercut images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 137.8 kB

  • Original 341.4 kB
  • After minification 319.1 kB
  • After compression 203.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 137.8 kB or 40% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 9.0 kB

  • Original 12.0 kB
  • After minification 9.2 kB
  • After compression 3.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Epercut.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.0 kB or 75% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (51%)

Requests Now

79

After Optimization

39

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Epercut. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

epercut.com

epercut.com

278 ms

www.epercut.com

www.epercut.com

377 ms

style.css

style.css

147 ms

voile.css

voile.css

217 ms

apple_menu.css

apple_menu.css

218 ms

slimbox.css

slimbox.css

219 ms

thumbox.css

thumbox.css

208 ms

wysiwyg.css

wysiwyg.css

221 ms

jquery-1.4.2.min.js

jquery-1.4.2.min.js

480 ms

corner.js

corner.js

334 ms

init.js

init.js

329 ms

menu.js

menu.js

341 ms

easing.js

easing.js

328 ms

voile.js

voile.js

346 ms

form.js

form.js

444 ms

apple_menu.js

apple_menu.js

448 ms

slimbox.js

slimbox.js

456 ms

moatext.js

moatext.js

467 ms

airport.js

airport.js

452 ms

captcha.js

captcha.js

564 ms

ga.js

ga.js

46 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

71 ms

logo.png

logo.png

332 ms

ani-bg.png

ani-bg.png

243 ms

ch.png

ch.png

244 ms

154.jpg

154.jpg

217 ms

238.jpg

238.jpg

390 ms

220.jpg

220.jpg

244 ms

cb.png

cb.png

342 ms

mail.png

mail.png

343 ms

tel.png

tel.png

361 ms

blog.png

blog.png

371 ms

192.png

192.png

457 ms

253.png

253.png

525 ms

145.png

145.png

513 ms

256.png

256.png

523 ms

141.png

141.png

519 ms

251.png

251.png

553 ms

207.png

207.png

592 ms

143.png

143.png

683 ms

142.png

142.png

648 ms

255.png

255.png

667 ms

236.png

236.png

667 ms

254.png

254.png

678 ms

223.png

223.png

699 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

751 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

773 ms

m8.png

m8.png

807 ms

cm.png

cm.png

748 ms

a0.png

a0.png

751 ms

a1.png

a1.png

763 ms

a2.png

a2.png

815 ms

a3.png

a3.png

844 ms

a4.png

a4.png

853 ms

a5.png

a5.png

852 ms

a6.png

a6.png

865 ms

a7.png

a7.png

909 ms

aeroport.png

aeroport.png

916 ms

all.js

all.js

25 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

21 ms

all.js

all.js

16 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

9 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

43 ms

fastbutton

fastbutton

66 ms

48 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

37 ms

3604799710-postmessagerelay.js

3604799710-postmessagerelay.js

16 ms

rpc:shindig_random.js

rpc:shindig_random.js

18 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

4 ms

developers.google.com

developers.google.com

477 ms

b.png

b.png

844 ms

pc.png

pc.png

761 ms

devis.png

devis.png

760 ms

tarif.png

tarif.png

823 ms

pdp.gif

pdp.gif

736 ms

rs.png

rs.png

725 ms

m0.png

m0.png

792 ms

m1.png

m1.png

801 ms

m2.png

m2.png

878 ms

m3.png

m3.png

852 ms

m4.png

m4.png

742 ms

m5.png

m5.png

723 ms

m6.png

m6.png

762 ms

m7.png

m7.png

797 ms

Accessibility Review

epercut.com accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

epercut.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

epercut.com SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses plugins

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Epercut.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Epercut.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

epercut.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Epercut. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: