Tools & Wizards About Us
epigrams.co screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

epigrams.co

DORA Metrics, DX and SPACE for Engineering Intelligence - Waydev

Page Load Speed

6.9 sec in total

First Response

114 ms

Resources Loaded

5 sec

Page Rendered

1.8 sec

epigrams.co screenshot

About Website

Welcome to epigrams.co homepage info - get ready to check Epigrams best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about epigrams.co

✅ DORA Metrics, DX, and SPACE with Waydev Platform for Software Engineering Intelligence (SEI)! Waydev provides data-driven insights to help you ship faster and align engineering with business goals.

Visit epigrams.co

Key Findings

We analyzed Epigrams.co page load time and found that the first response time was 114 ms and then it took 6.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

epigrams.co performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

69/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

74/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.7 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value24,260 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value33.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

epigrams.co

114 ms

waydev.co

444 ms

e944600baccc0f5e5a2b3734ec0fddc2.css

71 ms

ef85421c3dad2acd6ffadae4d48150bc.js

178 ms

jquery.min.js

229 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Epigrams.co, 71% (24 requests) were made to Waydev.co and 15% (5 requests) were made to Dev.visualwebsiteoptimizer.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.9 sec) relates to the external source Waydev.co.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 254.3 kB (50%)

Content Size

510.8 kB

After Optimization

256.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Epigrams.co main page is 510.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 263.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 219.8 kB

  • Original 263.9 kB
  • After minification 248.7 kB
  • After compression 44.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 219.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 25.0 kB

  • Original 116.4 kB
  • After minification 91.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Epigrams needs image optimization as it can save up to 25.0 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 9.5 kB

  • Original 90.7 kB
  • After minification 90.7 kB
  • After compression 81.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 29 B

  • Original 39.8 kB
  • After minification 39.8 kB
  • After compression 39.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Epigrams.co has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (83%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Epigrams. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

epigrams.co

epigrams.co

114 ms

waydev.co

waydev.co

444 ms

e944600baccc0f5e5a2b3734ec0fddc2.css

e944600baccc0f5e5a2b3734ec0fddc2.css

71 ms

ef85421c3dad2acd6ffadae4d48150bc.js

ef85421c3dad2acd6ffadae4d48150bc.js

178 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

229 ms

8a766e2b5e3fdae7af84e730b17ec174.js

8a766e2b5e3fdae7af84e730b17ec174.js

230 ms

8955b0fb9afeb1eb094d82634059d2b8.js

8955b0fb9afeb1eb094d82634059d2b8.js

229 ms

js

js

359 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

191 ms

e33529cd542c63bfd32070ec0ac1d36e.js

e33529cd542c63bfd32070ec0ac1d36e.js

200 ms

e4c8dd261cd0a917c64d2195eea2de1f.js

e4c8dd261cd0a917c64d2195eea2de1f.js

191 ms

9434770.js

9434770.js

324 ms

d8b6d90a80c8ca59e2cec7da37097abe.js

d8b6d90a80c8ca59e2cec7da37097abe.js

320 ms

7cb8101364e104b4498a8c1f225eddbe.js

7cb8101364e104b4498a8c1f225eddbe.js

323 ms

e2d12ff236c8bb5f672bb64fe42a8d20.js

e2d12ff236c8bb5f672bb64fe42a8d20.js

320 ms

d1435e6d307536d943fb733b8af9815f.js

d1435e6d307536d943fb733b8af9815f.js

319 ms

74826d931a2c7803974eed8af754c4c7.js

74826d931a2c7803974eed8af754c4c7.js

322 ms

2cab9cfdfba6f44cc13d668c4342844e.js

2cab9cfdfba6f44cc13d668c4342844e.js

317 ms

e0ec75ef2e4127615d6e66c6a340ceee.js

e0ec75ef2e4127615d6e66c6a340ceee.js

335 ms

api.js

api.js

337 ms

25a0fb45681bc1e0be553d56a4558921.js

25a0fb45681bc1e0be553d56a4558921.js

333 ms

a4dcd6e76cecbbc1a1cc17c44ad4195c.js

a4dcd6e76cecbbc1a1cc17c44ad4195c.js

335 ms

1d3af4e6a56ce24d77d7a9033d9b173e.js

1d3af4e6a56ce24d77d7a9033d9b173e.js

330 ms

rocket-loader.min.js

rocket-loader.min.js

320 ms

j.php

j.php

484 ms

Mask-group.png

Mask-group.png

308 ms

visual.png

visual.png

281 ms

30f9adcd-d143-44b7-9f0a-c17ce5c59aeb.woff

30f9adcd-d143-44b7-9f0a-c17ce5c59aeb.woff

3898 ms

bbb0ea08-8e28-4bbc-9726-ee5ca0922351.woff

bbb0ea08-8e28-4bbc-9726-ee5ca0922351.woff

3712 ms

v.gif

v.gif

58 ms

tag-90d1c59b328d9c90a45785e87c70a86f.js

tag-90d1c59b328d9c90a45785e87c70a86f.js

18 ms

settings.js

settings.js

19 ms

uc.js

uc.js

114 ms

settings.js

settings.js

19 ms

Accessibility Review

epigrams.co accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

epigrams.co best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

epigrams.co SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Epigrams.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Epigrams.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

epigrams.co

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Epigrams. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: