4.5 sec in total
437 ms
3.2 sec
813 ms
Welcome to epitomelogistics.in homepage info - get ready to check Epitome Logistics best content right away, or after learning these important things about epitomelogistics.in
Epitome is established and offering quality services to the clients. We maintain Delivery times, transport costs, transit risk insurance and taking all other safety measures.
Visit epitomelogistics.inWe analyzed Epitomelogistics.in page load time and found that the first response time was 437 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
epitomelogistics.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
64/100
10%
Value19.3 s
0/100
25%
Value5.2 s
59/100
10%
Value830 ms
35/100
30%
Value0.01
100/100
15%
Value18.9 s
3/100
10%
437 ms
189 ms
197 ms
409 ms
203 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Epitomelogistics.in, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Epitomelogistics.in.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (17%)
6.2 MB
5.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Epitomelogistics.in main page is 6.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 88.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 841.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Epitome Logistics needs image optimization as it can save up to 841.5 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 79.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 79.5 kB or 28% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Epitomelogistics.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.1 kB or 31% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (41%)
70
41
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Epitome Logistics. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
epitomelogistics.in
437 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
189 ms
style.min.css
197 ms
styles.css
409 ms
front.min.css
203 ms
popupaoc-public-style.css
226 ms
fl-icons.css
215 ms
style.css
372 ms
flatsome.css
374 ms
style.css
380 ms
jquery.js
422 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
412 ms
front.min.js
568 ms
email-decode.min.js
378 ms
scripts.js
561 ms
flatsome-live-search.js
562 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
638 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
638 ms
script.min.js
638 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
767 ms
flatsome.js
769 ms
wp-embed.min.js
767 ms
custombox.legacy.min.js
836 ms
popupaoc-popup.min.js
835 ms
main.min.js
858 ms
webfont.js
110 ms
analytics.js
120 ms
epitomelogistics2.png
354 ms
MTO-Certificate-1-pdf-283x400.jpg
357 ms
Heavy-Project-Cargo.png
353 ms
Ocean-Freight-Cargo.png
420 ms
airFreight.jpg
416 ms
cargo-1.png
425 ms
rail.png
539 ms
warehouse-icon-png-0.jpg-2.png
536 ms
road-icon1.png
548 ms
flight1.jpg
602 ms
Lifting_operation1-400x400.jpg
659 ms
vessel-icon-25.jpg.png
612 ms
icon-customs-1.jpg
730 ms
sea-freight-537x400.png
739 ms
4-480x400.png
739 ms
2-480x400.png
801 ms
3-480x400.png
995 ms
BB4-483x400.png
874 ms
5-480x400.png
1076 ms
BB5-480x400.png
1127 ms
101_0173-480x400.png
1140 ms
BB6-480x400.png
1205 ms
agni.png
1059 ms
Alsina.png
1179 ms
Aquatech.png
1235 ms
Greaves-Cotton.png
1260 ms
hem.png
1302 ms
fl-icons.ttf
1333 ms
Khimji-Ramdas.png
1291 ms
Phoenix-Healthcare.png
1309 ms
css
49 ms
collect
19 ms
js
92 ms
font
32 ms
Seatech.png
1256 ms
Unilift-Cargo-System.png
1280 ms
footer-map.jpg
1335 ms
frontend.min.css
1294 ms
popup.min.css
1303 ms
MTO-Certificate-1.pdf
1416 ms
icegram.min.js
1337 ms
home01a.jpg
191 ms
home02.jpg
189 ms
home03a.jpg
183 ms
banner-4.jpg
88 ms
Pics.png
89 ms
sprite_1.png
211 ms
epitomelogistics.in accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
epitomelogistics.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
epitomelogistics.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Epitomelogistics.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Epitomelogistics.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
epitomelogistics.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Epitome Logistics. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: