Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

epm1.net

Pest Control Columbus Ohio | Environmental Pest Management

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

127 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

685 ms

epm1.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to epm1.net homepage info - get ready to check Epm 1 best content right away, or after learning these important things about epm1.net

Get guaranteed pest control services from trusted Columbus Exterminators. Specialists in rodent, wasp, spider, termites, and bed bug removal and prevention.

Visit epm1.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Epm1.net page load time and found that the first response time was 127 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

epm1.net performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.0 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,290 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value27.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

epm1.net

127 ms

epm1.net

215 ms

gtm.js

67 ms

js

108 ms

css

36 ms

Our browser made a total of 113 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Epm1.net, 18% (20 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (716 ms) belongs to the original domain Epm1.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 393.2 kB (15%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

2.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Epm1.net main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 135.0 kB

  • Original 173.8 kB
  • After minification 168.2 kB
  • After compression 38.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 135.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Epm 1 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 233.5 kB

  • Original 633.5 kB
  • After minification 633.5 kB
  • After compression 400.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 233.5 kB or 37% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 24.8 kB

  • Original 223.4 kB
  • After minification 218.6 kB
  • After compression 198.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Epm1.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.8 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 74 (77%)

Requests Now

96

After Optimization

22

The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Epm 1. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 44 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

epm1.net accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

epm1.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

epm1.net SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Epm1.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Epm1.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Epm 1. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: