Tools & Wizards About Us
eposignal.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

eposignal.ru

Энгельсское приборостроительное объединение "Сигнал": газовое оборудование, газовые счетчики

Page Load Speed

23.7 sec in total

First Response

572 ms

Resources Loaded

23 sec

Page Rendered

136 ms

eposignal.ru screenshot

About Website

Welcome to eposignal.ru homepage info - get ready to check Eposignal best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about eposignal.ru

Сайт ЭПО "Сигнал"

Visit eposignal.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Eposignal.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 572 ms and then it took 23.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

eposignal.ru performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.6 s

17/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value710 ms

42/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.421

23/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.0 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

eposignal.ru

572 ms

eposignal.ru

691 ms

core.css

149 ms

template_2d2c92bb216361be7d823f8620beb327_v1.css

301 ms

core.js

831 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Eposignal.ru, 5% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to 0. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.5 sec) relates to the external source .

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 30.2 kB (41%)

Content Size

74.3 kB

After Optimization

44.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Eposignal.ru main page is 74.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 36.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 28.2 kB

  • Original 36.3 kB
  • After minification 29.0 kB
  • After compression 8.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.4 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.2 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 356 B

  • Original 1.5 kB
  • After minification 1.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Eposignal needs image optimization as it can save up to 356 B or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 36.4 kB
  • After minification 36.4 kB
  • After compression 34.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (56%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eposignal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

eposignal.ru

eposignal.ru

572 ms

eposignal.ru

eposignal.ru

691 ms

core.css

core.css

149 ms

template_2d2c92bb216361be7d823f8620beb327_v1.css

template_2d2c92bb216361be7d823f8620beb327_v1.css

301 ms

core.js

core.js

831 ms

kernel_main_v1.js

kernel_main_v1.js

736 ms

core_db.js

core_db.js

446 ms

core_ls.min.js

core_ls.min.js

446 ms

core_frame_cache.min.js

core_frame_cache.min.js

446 ms

template_4cde725ef8be44db0084bd7d6e4bfcd3_v1.js

template_4cde725ef8be44db0084bd7d6e4bfcd3_v1.js

446 ms

jquery-1.12.4.min.js

jquery-1.12.4.min.js

26 ms

share.js

share.js

563 ms

script.js

script.js

596 ms

element-plus.2.1.8.css

element-plus.2.1.8.css

759 ms

style.css

style.css

594 ms

vue.global.3.2.31.js

vue.global.3.2.31.js

1052 ms

axios.js

axios.js

925 ms

element-plus.2.1.8.js

element-plus.2.1.8.js

1200 ms

main.js

main.js

924 ms

footmenustyle.css

footmenustyle.css

925 ms

js

js

75 ms

amazon_scroller.js

amazon_scroller.js

963 ms

spread.php

spread.php

53 ms

spread.php

spread.php

20450 ms

watch.js

watch.js

50 ms

3_0_2AA5E1FF_0A85C1FF_0_pageviews

3_0_2AA5E1FF_0A85C1FF_0_pageviews

651 ms

rut.png

rut.png

150 ms

_logo.png

_logo.png

146 ms

sbg.png

sbg.png

591 ms

maingazimg.png

maingazimg.png

473 ms

siglogo.png

siglogo.png

293 ms

otop-logo.png

otop-logo.png

293 ms

manlogo.png

manlogo.png

304 ms

list_b.gif

list_b.gif

180 ms

link_arrow.gif

link_arrow.gif

181 ms

youtube.png

youtube.png

180 ms

js

js

48 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

19 ms

collect

collect

89 ms

drop-shadow.png

drop-shadow.png

413 ms

zoomout.cur

zoomout.cur

423 ms

loader.white.gif

loader.white.gif

423 ms

Accessibility Review

eposignal.ru accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

eposignal.ru best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

eposignal.ru SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1251

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eposignal.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Eposignal.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

eposignal.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Eposignal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: