1.4 sec in total
28 ms
860 ms
501 ms
Click here to check amazing E Privacy Link content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about eprivacylink.com
Fencing, privacy fence slats, & accessories for contractors. Home of the factory-inserted privacy fence slat. Get a free quote today.
Visit eprivacylink.comWe analyzed Eprivacylink.com page load time and found that the first response time was 28 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
eprivacylink.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
45/100
10%
Value35.0 s
0/100
25%
Value15.3 s
1/100
10%
Value1,460 ms
15/100
30%
Value0.514
15/100
15%
Value29.3 s
0/100
10%
28 ms
37 ms
8 ms
20 ms
46 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Eprivacylink.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (443 ms) belongs to the original domain Eprivacylink.com.
Page size can be reduced by 949.5 kB (10%)
9.2 MB
8.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Eprivacylink.com main page is 9.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 8.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 154.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 154.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 709.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. E Privacy Link images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 51.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 51.7 kB or 11% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eprivacylink.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 34.1 kB or 26% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (52%)
69
33
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of E Privacy Link. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
eprivacylink.com
28 ms
eprivacylink.com
37 ms
contact-form-7.min.css
8 ms
style.min.css
20 ms
style-static.min.css
46 ms
jquery.js
84 ms
jquery-migrate.js
39 ms
sharethis.js
96 ms
t.js
104 ms
slick.min.css
81 ms
slick-theme.min.css
110 ms
slick.min.js
138 ms
js
110 ms
et-core-unified-tb-30738-tb-31928-2.min.css
37 ms
et-core-unified-2.min.css
40 ms
et-core-unified-tb-30738-tb-31928-deferred-2.min.css
77 ms
hustle-icons.min.css
76 ms
hustle-global.min.css
78 ms
hustle-info.min.css
79 ms
hustle-popup.min.css
79 ms
css
103 ms
hooks.js
101 ms
i18n.js
100 ms
swv.min.js
101 ms
contact-form-7.min.js
107 ms
cf7-google-analytics.min.js
102 ms
hustle-ui.min.js
106 ms
underscore.min.js
106 ms
front.min.js
106 ms
scripts.min.js
110 ms
app.min.js
106 ms
et-core-common.min.js
115 ms
api.js
107 ms
wp-polyfill.js
114 ms
wpcf7-recaptcha.min.js
113 ms
dwf.js
115 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
115 ms
jquery.mobile.js
113 ms
analytics.js
26 ms
collect
204 ms
PrivacyLink-Fence-Logo.png
172 ms
7d8ae3c69e2f0706f473ab31f1b634c029719a4d.jpg
410 ms
ajax-loader.gif
82 ms
Noodle-Link-Low-res-72.jpeg
232 ms
Noodle-Link-Plus-website.jpg
78 ms
PrivacyMaster_Roll.jpg
80 ms
PrivacyLink-low-res.jpeg
231 ms
IndustrialLink_Roll.jpg
84 ms
Brown-bottom-lock.jpg
78 ms
EZ_Slat_End_View.jpg
81 ms
Ultimate-Slat-end-view.jpeg
83 ms
PrivacyLink-product-page-header.jpg
440 ms
Bottom_Locking_Slats-copy-1.jpg
232 ms
Ultimate_Slats1-1.png
230 ms
EZ_Slats.jpg
230 ms
FeatherLock_Slats.jpg
233 ms
Winged-fence-slats-from-PrivacyLink-Utah.jpg
406 ms
Background-Wire-Image.jpg
299 ms
barrier-boundary-wall-300x279.png
232 ms
engineer-workers-300x195.png
234 ms
Distributors-Dealers-Contractors-PrivacyLink-01.png
408 ms
Landscape-Architects-Specifiers-PrivacyLink-01.png
436 ms
Contact-PrivacyLink-Fencing-Today-01.png
407 ms
PrivacyLink-Fence-Supplier-in-Utah.jpg
435 ms
AFA-Member-01.png
411 ms
ASTM-Member-01.png
437 ms
Chain-Link-Fence-Mfg-Institute-Member-01.png
437 ms
Made-in-USA-copy.png
440 ms
Screen-Shot-2024-06-27-at-2.49.00-PM.png
443 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpfBK.woff
208 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpfBJ.ttf
365 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyovBK.woff
386 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyovBJ.ttf
387 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyXsovBK.woff
413 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyXsovBJ.ttf
413 ms
modules.woff
417 ms
slick.woff
58 ms
Front-Cover-1.jpg
366 ms
recaptcha__en.js
234 ms
eprivacylink.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
eprivacylink.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
eprivacylink.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eprivacylink.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eprivacylink.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eprivacylink.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of E Privacy Link. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: