7.7 sec in total
1.6 sec
5.5 sec
623 ms
Visit eprofessional.de now to see the best up-to-date EPROFESSIONAL content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about eprofessional.de
Als eine der erfahrensten Digital Marketing Agenturen in Deutschland, gehört Eprofessional seit 1999 zu den Top-Adressen für das Digitale Marketing.
Visit eprofessional.deWe analyzed Eprofessional.de page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
eprofessional.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
30/100
10%
Value3.9 s
52/100
25%
Value8.3 s
19/100
10%
Value23,950 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value32.0 s
0/100
10%
1556 ms
190 ms
186 ms
187 ms
193 ms
Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Eprofessional.de, 8% (7 requests) were made to Dmp.theadex.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Eprofessional.de.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (44%)
2.7 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Eprofessional.de main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 91.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 91.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 133.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EPROFESSIONAL images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 421.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 421.2 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 563.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eprofessional.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 563.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 67 (76%)
88
21
The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EPROFESSIONAL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.eprofessional.de
1556 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
190 ms
styles.css
186 ms
easy-author-image.css
187 ms
settings.css
193 ms
public.css
186 ms
style.css
213 ms
animate.css
359 ms
prettyPhoto.css
362 ms
eislideshow.css
365 ms
responsive.css
363 ms
jplayer.blue.monday.css
372 ms
datepicker.css
380 ms
flexslider.css
540 ms
nivo-slider.css
547 ms
gmw.css
549 ms
default.min.css
547 ms
business-hours.css
556 ms
jquery.js
664 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
717 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
821 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
826 ms
public.min.js
732 ms
css
31 ms
comment-reply.min.js
724 ms
jquery.form.min.js
838 ms
scripts.js
882 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
903 ms
hoverIntent.js
901 ms
superfish.js
983 ms
jquery.jplayer.min.js
995 ms
jquery.preloadify.min.js
1014 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
1062 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
1082 ms
sys_custom.js
1085 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
1167 ms
jquery.eislideshow.js
1180 ms
waypoints.js
1200 ms
showvid.js
1122 ms
placeholders.js
1131 ms
jquery.colorbox.min.js
1136 ms
jquery.jcarousel.min.js
1220 ms
shortcodes.css
1211 ms
font-awesome.css
1207 ms
analytics.js
17 ms
adex.js
361 ms
search-icon.png
132 ms
facebook.png
129 ms
twitter.png
129 ms
google.png
229 ms
eprofessional_Logo_Webseite_freigestellt_72dpi.png
230 ms
stage11.png
1404 ms
Banner_Homepage.jpg
432 ms
Kleiner_Schlaumeier_Fotolia_40298094_XS-200x180.png
593 ms
Cases_200_180_mit_e-200x180.png
593 ms
2-display-barmenia.png
432 ms
jako-o.png
486 ms
Heine_Logo_190214.jpg
593 ms
itzehoer.gif
593 ms
eprofessional_Logo_weiss_Webseite_RGB.png
1288 ms
gtm.js
104 ms
collect
13 ms
collect
93 ms
all.js
193 ms
dark10.png
1212 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1233 ms
prev-horizontal.png
1100 ms
next-horizontal.png
1100 ms
planet_web.png
1175 ms
top_arrow.png
1178 ms
ga.js
35 ms
fbds.js
134 ms
t.js
97 ms
__utm.gif
38 ms
xd_arbiter.php
696 ms
1.gif
712 ms
analytic.js
707 ms
706 ms
iframe_api
649 ms
platform.js
621 ms
widgets.js
583 ms
loader.gif
111 ms
coloredbg.png
237 ms
bullet.png
230 ms
large_left.png
230 ms
large_right.png
218 ms
pixel
34 ms
pixel
78 ms
cm.gif
112 ms
www-widgetapi.js
107 ms
2.gif
103 ms
eprofessional.de accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
eprofessional.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
eprofessional.de SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eprofessional.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eprofessional.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eprofessional.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of EPROFESSIONAL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: