Tools & Wizards About Us
epsilon.jp screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

epsilon.jp

決済を導入するならGMOイプシロン株式会社

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

718 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

58 ms

epsilon.jp screenshot

About Website

Welcome to epsilon.jp homepage info - get ready to check Epsilon best content for Japan right away, or after learning these important things about epsilon.jp

決済代行サービスなら実績と信頼のGMOイプシロン株式会社へ。クレジットカード・コンビニをはじめ、3Dセキュアやセキュリティコードなどのオプションサービスも。

Visit epsilon.jp

Key Findings

We analyzed Epsilon.jp page load time and found that the first response time was 718 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

epsilon.jp performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.1 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.5 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,800 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.4 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

epsilon.jp

718 ms

js

61 ms

cssfilter_top.css

181 ms

footerstyle.css

322 ms

main_bnr.css

353 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Epsilon.jp, 5% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (878 ms) belongs to the original domain Epsilon.jp.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 94.1 kB (44%)

Content Size

216.1 kB

After Optimization

122.0 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Epsilon.jp main page is 216.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 137.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 4.0 kB

  • Original 5.8 kB
  • After minification 5.3 kB
  • After compression 1.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.0 kB or 69% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 63.5 kB

  • Original 137.3 kB
  • After minification 137.2 kB
  • After compression 73.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 63.5 kB or 46% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 26.5 kB

  • Original 73.0 kB
  • After minification 72.5 kB
  • After compression 46.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Epsilon.jp needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 26.5 kB or 36% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (83%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

6

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Epsilon. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

epsilon.jp

epsilon.jp

718 ms

js

js

61 ms

cssfilter_top.css

cssfilter_top.css

181 ms

footerstyle.css

footerstyle.css

322 ms

main_bnr.css

main_bnr.css

353 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

702 ms

jquery.easing.js

jquery.easing.js

526 ms

main_bnr.js

main_bnr.js

525 ms

styleswitcher.js

styleswitcher.js

527 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

528 ms

respMenu.css

respMenu.css

529 ms

jquery.mmenu.all.css

jquery.mmenu.all.css

702 ms

purchase_font.css

purchase_font.css

699 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

703 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

704 ms

top.js

top.js

704 ms

fixbtn.css

fixbtn.css

873 ms

jquery.mmenu.min.all.js

jquery.mmenu.min.all.js

878 ms

icon

icon

36 ms

js

js

47 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

16 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

collect

collect

60 ms

import_top.css

import_top.css

698 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

30 ms

main.css

main.css

179 ms

common.css

common.css

178 ms

font.css

font.css

177 ms

secondary.css

secondary.css

180 ms

primary.css

primary.css

185 ms

top2.css

top2.css

188 ms

style_sitema.css

style_sitema.css

351 ms

temp.css

temp.css

350 ms

lightbox.css

lightbox.css

354 ms

superTables.css

superTables.css

353 ms

bg_body.gif

bg_body.gif

177 ms

small.css

small.css

178 ms

large.css

large.css

177 ms

Accessibility Review

epsilon.jp accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

epsilon.jp best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

epsilon.jp SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Epsilon.jp can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Epsilon.jp main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

epsilon.jp

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Epsilon. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: