1.1 sec in total
101 ms
696 ms
322 ms
Visit epspack.net now to see the best up-to-date EPSPACK content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about epspack.net
High-quality specialty packaging products designed and value-engineered using corrugated boxes, foam and shrink-pack for all products, especially automotive glass,and other services.
Visit epspack.netWe analyzed Epspack.net page load time and found that the first response time was 101 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
epspack.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
51/100
10%
Value5.5 s
18/100
25%
Value3.2 s
92/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.421
23/100
15%
Value6.6 s
57/100
10%
101 ms
50 ms
69 ms
93 ms
102 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Epspack.net, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (214 ms) belongs to the original domain Epspack.net.
Page size can be reduced by 244.2 kB (48%)
506.1 kB
261.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Epspack.net main page is 506.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 229.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, EPSPACK needs image optimization as it can save up to 30.0 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 142.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 142.5 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 47.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Epspack.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 47.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (68%)
60
19
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EPSPACK. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
epspack.net
101 ms
50 ms
style.css
69 ms
style-fix.js
93 ms
css_browser_selector.js
102 ms
search-google.css
105 ms
navigation-f122b51c-9c56-1281-1508-07c4645416d9.css
106 ms
jquery.min.js
154 ms
jquery.jcarousellite.js
107 ms
jquery.simplemodal.js
115 ms
imagegallery.js
164 ms
imagegallery.css
127 ms
imagegallery.locale-en_US.js
128 ms
navigation-7c19d3e8-ca80-6ab0-456e-efa36cff6b9c.css
131 ms
helpers.js
136 ms
jsapi
21 ms
anti_cache.js
134 ms
loader.js
21 ms
analytics.js
47 ms
background10-white.png
37 ms
external-border-none-top-left.png
38 ms
external-border-none-top-right.png
38 ms
external-border-none-top-left2.png
41 ms
external-border-none-top-right2.png
40 ms
external-border-none-top.png
35 ms
external-border-none-left.png
66 ms
external-border-none-left-top.png
67 ms
external-border-none-left-bottom.png
67 ms
external-border-none-right.png
67 ms
external-border-none-right-top.png
68 ms
external-border-none-right-bottom.png
67 ms
background7-black.png
91 ms
border1-black-top-left.png
91 ms
border1-black-top-right.png
91 ms
border1-black-top.png
92 ms
border1-black-left.png
93 ms
border1-black-right.png
93 ms
EPS-new-logo_2.jpg
211 ms
border1-black-bottom-left.png
118 ms
border1-black-bottom-right.png
117 ms
border1-black-bottom.png
116 ms
external-border-none-bottom-left.png
115 ms
external-border-none-bottom-right.png
115 ms
external-border-none-bottom-left2.png
208 ms
external-border-none-bottom-right2.png
209 ms
external-border-none-bottom.png
209 ms
32107fe9-a3be-035f-248b-2c44f1e1b6e9.thumb.jpg
210 ms
6451e558-fd40-8290-e695-531bc320f3f1.thumb.jpg
210 ms
20e32879-0d8d-10b1-cd70-42688bbf2def.thumb.png
212 ms
1bf2a995-abc9-8308-5243-55160c94f398.thumb.jpg
211 ms
390360c0-2820-6a5f-1875-d4651c6d8e14.thumb.jpg
212 ms
f466741b-3a55-8f26-e91e-a75c26f5d077.thumb.jpg
214 ms
3402a3d2-0e38-f8e6-d51a-53f6746758b8.thumb.jpg
214 ms
68259fb4-f3d4-3f7a-8966-fbfd69fa23a8.thumb.jpg
213 ms
ce71e70f-e2c5-21c1-2a33-36d99e5bf8f8.thumb.jpg
208 ms
collect
13 ms
08305ffb-a8f5-df52-8412-3b934da6f56a.thumb.jpg
183 ms
c5c1096d-a86a-96f5-a48c-a2ff0502b1b3.thumb.jpg
184 ms
0c4d2071-1aa0-db38-a78e-f725e5b8e78b.thumb.jpg
182 ms
0fca04ad-1865-8b7f-1816-03f0a0befedd.thumb.jpg
184 ms
eb82ca51-ae30-d80a-5c5b-75603e00a322.thumb.jpg
181 ms
frame-normal-bg.png
186 ms
js
82 ms
epspack.net accessibility score
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<object> elements do not have alternate text
epspack.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
epspack.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document uses plugins
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Epspack.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Epspack.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
epspack.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of EPSPACK. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: