Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

erabota.ru

Работа в Новосибирске, вакансии и резюме, поиск работы на Rabota.ru

Page Load Speed

6.2 sec in total

First Response

382 ms

Resources Loaded

4.3 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

erabota.ru screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing E Rabota content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about erabota.ru

Простой и удобный поиск работы, все вакансии в Новосибирске, только проверенные работодатели. Найти работу легко — Rabota.ru устраивает всех!

Visit erabota.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Erabota.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 382 ms and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

erabota.ru performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

26/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.8 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,550 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.084

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

erabota.ru

382 ms

nsk.rabota.ru

2523 ms

polyfill.min.js

1129 ms

sv152.js

576 ms

mobile-app-icon.4aa330c.svg

737 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Erabota.ru, 63% (40 requests) were made to Cdn1.rabota.ru and 11% (7 requests) were made to Cdn1-media.rabota.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) relates to the external source Nsk.rabota.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 998.4 kB (57%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

757.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Erabota.ru main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 932.2 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 161.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 932.2 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 60.6 kB

  • Original 615.3 kB
  • After minification 554.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. E Rabota images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 5.6 kB

  • Original 46.9 kB
  • After minification 46.8 kB
  • After compression 41.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 5.6 kB or 12% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (61%)

Requests Now

61

After Optimization

24

The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of E Rabota. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

erabota.ru accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

erabota.ru best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

erabota.ru SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Erabota.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Erabota.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of E Rabota. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: