7.3 sec in total
512 ms
5.9 sec
939 ms
Visit eracom.in now to see the best up-to-date Eracom content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about eracom.in
Visit eracom.inWe analyzed Eracom.in page load time and found that the first response time was 512 ms and then it took 6.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
eracom.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
44/100
10%
Value11.8 s
0/100
25%
Value9.2 s
13/100
10%
Value890 ms
32/100
30%
Value0.012
100/100
15%
Value12.2 s
15/100
10%
512 ms
348 ms
346 ms
428 ms
343 ms
Our browser made a total of 122 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Eracom.in, 28% (34 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Eracom.in.
Page size can be reduced by 204.5 kB (12%)
1.7 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Eracom.in main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 140.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 140.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 63.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Eracom images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 329 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eracom.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (60%)
84
34
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eracom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
eracom.in
512 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
348 ms
post-9.css
346 ms
post-10.css
428 ms
depicter-pre.css
343 ms
css
40 ms
style.min.css
341 ms
theme.min.css
388 ms
post-5.css
661 ms
ekiticons.css
939 ms
general.min.css
352 ms
eael-947.css
657 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
766 ms
swiper.min.css
799 ms
she-header-style.css
746 ms
global.css
975 ms
post-947.css
1169 ms
widget-styles.css
1535 ms
responsive.css
1087 ms
css
41 ms
fontawesome.min.css
1124 ms
solid.min.css
1250 ms
brands.min.css
1291 ms
jquery.min.js
1403 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1451 ms
she-header.js
1571 ms
js
71 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
1612 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
1576 ms
post-879.css
1686 ms
animations.min.css
1883 ms
email-decode.min.js
1509 ms
depicter.js
2173 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
1934 ms
frontend-script.js
1934 ms
widget-scripts.js
1995 ms
wpfront-scroll-top.min.js
2011 ms
general.min.js
2063 ms
jquery-numerator.min.js
2203 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
2003 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
2025 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
2095 ms
waypoints.min.js
2276 ms
core.min.js
2310 ms
frontend.min.js
2393 ms
animate-circle.min.js
2243 ms
elementor.js
2122 ms
underscore.min.js
2097 ms
wp-util.min.js
2205 ms
frontend.min.js
2212 ms
cropped-logo-Eracom-2048x557.png
1588 ms
cropped-logo-Eracom.png
1669 ms
browser.webp
1516 ms
web-browser.webp
1512 ms
file.webp
1690 ms
image_comparison_laptop.png
2003 ms
image_comparison_laptop-1.png
1827 ms
laravel.png
1927 ms
Shopify_logo.png
1703 ms
bootstrap.png
1784 ms
nodejs.png
2104 ms
React_logo.png
2305 ms
codeigniter_logo.png
2068 ms
Blockchain-Logo.png
2186 ms
js
74 ms
analytics.js
122 ms
js
125 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
105 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
121 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
125 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
123 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
124 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
126 ms
elementskit.woff
2649 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
64 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf
62 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
69 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf
68 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf
67 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mx9IjVBNI0.ttf
66 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mxEIjVBNI0.ttf
67 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mwjIjVBNI0.ttf
68 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mwKIjVBNI0.ttf
70 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7myRJTVBNI0.ttf
71 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7myjJTVBNI0.ttf
68 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mz9JTVBNI0.ttf
70 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mwjJTVBNI0.ttf
71 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7myjJDVBNI0.ttf
275 ms
rnCq-x1S2hzjrlfft8cutV3G.ttf
230 ms
rnCq-x1S2hzjrlff08YutV3G.ttf
278 ms
rnCq-x1S2hzjrlff68QutV3G.ttf
276 ms
rnCq-x1S2hzjrlffm8AutV3G.ttf
278 ms
rnCp-x1S2hzjrlfXaOM-.ttf
278 ms
rnCq-x1S2hzjrlffw8EutV3G.ttf
281 ms
rnCq-x1S2hzjrlffp8IutV3G.ttf
279 ms
rnCr-x1S2hzjrlffC9M5kn0.ttf
280 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
2441 ms
collect
168 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
2273 ms
FLUTTER.png
1816 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsE.ttf
36 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc6CsE.ttf
34 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsE.ttf
36 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf
37 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf
35 ms
KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzAdKg.ttf
35 ms
WordPress_logo.png
2310 ms
collect
89 ms
vuejs.png
2071 ms
mongodb.png
1889 ms
mysql0.png
2210 ms
java.png
2255 ms
python.png
2272 ms
javascript_logo.png
2293 ms
php.png
2349 ms
opencart_logo.png
2363 ms
solidity_logo.png
2208 ms
era-8.png
2460 ms
yh-2-e1696403704775.png
2353 ms
text-mask-image-1.jpg
2213 ms
menu_bg.png
2209 ms
114.png
320 ms
eracom.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
eracom.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
eracom.in SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eracom.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eracom.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eracom.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Eracom. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: