5 sec in total
539 ms
3.8 sec
626 ms
Visit erapro.ru now to see the best up-to-date Erapro content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about erapro.ru
Архитектурное бюро «Эра Проект» осуществляет проектирование зданий и сооружений, дорог, наружных инженерных сетей, производит технический надзор, инженерно-геодезические работы. Организация отмечена д...
Visit erapro.ruWe analyzed Erapro.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 539 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
erapro.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
48/100
10%
Value3.4 s
66/100
25%
Value9.6 s
11/100
10%
Value1,010 ms
27/100
30%
Value0.639
9/100
15%
Value9.7 s
28/100
10%
539 ms
766 ms
500 ms
377 ms
389 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (84 requests) were addressed to the original Erapro.ru, 2% (2 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Mc.yandex.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Erapro.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 800.0 kB (70%)
1.1 MB
337.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Erapro.ru main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 743.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 88.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.9 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 314 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Erapro images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 475.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 475.2 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 235.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Erapro.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 235.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (24%)
79
60
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Erapro. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
erapro.ru
539 ms
erapro.ru
766 ms
bootstrap.min.css
500 ms
flaticon.css
377 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
389 ms
owl.theme.css
388 ms
lightgallery.css
519 ms
settings.css
532 ms
style.css
752 ms
jquery.min.js
758 ms
mousewheel.min.js
396 ms
lightgallery-all.min.js
502 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
758 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
758 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
758 ms
easypiechart.min.js
627 ms
jquery.countdown.min.js
758 ms
scripts.js
758 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
979 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
978 ms
revolution-plugin.js
1056 ms
rev-script-3.js
974 ms
tag.js
932 ms
logo.png
316 ms
icon_whatsapp.svg
317 ms
icon_telegram.svg
333 ms
1648_1142.webp
388 ms
erapro.ru
612 ms
868_860.webp
612 ms
shtamp_19.webp
396 ms
sl_02.webp
679 ms
shtamp_21.webp
611 ms
868_860_3.webp
648 ms
shtamp_22.webp
612 ms
1920_325.webp
614 ms
prj_01_zil_01_s.webp
614 ms
prj_02_globus_06_s.webp
639 ms
prj_03_kashirka_01_s.webp
649 ms
prj_04_bobrovo_s.webp
719 ms
prj_05_kosino_s.webp
721 ms
prj_06_planeta_s.webp
768 ms
prj_07_dou_s.webp
776 ms
prj_08_lerua_s.webp
777 ms
prj_09_hram_s.webp
811 ms
prj_10_parki_s.webp
845 ms
960_740_2.webp
847 ms
hhh_1.webp
897 ms
bg_prj-2.webp
1034 ms
00.webp
898 ms
00_1.webp
897 ms
01.webp
898 ms
02.webp
899 ms
03.webp
931 ms
04.webp
942 ms
Robotocondensed.woff
980 ms
Robotocondensedbold.woff
805 ms
Oswaldbold.woff
804 ms
Oswaldregular.woff
861 ms
Flaticon.svg
849 ms
Flaticon.woff
847 ms
05.webp
877 ms
06.webp
842 ms
07.webp
648 ms
08.webp
824 ms
logo_w2.png
684 ms
logos_01.webp
688 ms
logos_02.webp
733 ms
logos_03.webp
735 ms
logos_04.webp
736 ms
logos_05.webp
807 ms
logos_06.webp
789 ms
logos_07.webp
830 ms
logos_08.webp
824 ms
logos_09.webp
797 ms
logos_010.webp
828 ms
logos_011.webp
831 ms
logos_012.webp
788 ms
logos_013.webp
822 ms
logos_014.webp
821 ms
logos_015.webp
798 ms
bg-iconbox1_2.webp
831 ms
close.png
834 ms
bullet-white.png
789 ms
map.webp
733 ms
shtamp_19.webp
733 ms
advert.gif
668 ms
sync_cookie_image_decide
139 ms
erapro.ru accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
erapro.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
erapro.ru SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Erapro.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Erapro.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
erapro.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Erapro. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: