3.6 sec in total
79 ms
2 sec
1.6 sec
Visit eraser.us now to see the best up-to-date Eraser content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about eraser.us
Discover safe, effective laser tattoo removal and fading solutions tailored to you. Our expert laser treatments erase the past. Get started today!
Visit eraser.usWe analyzed Eraser.us page load time and found that the first response time was 79 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
eraser.us performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
51/100
10%
Value5.5 s
18/100
25%
Value14.2 s
1/100
10%
Value9,520 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.07
96/100
15%
Value27.1 s
0/100
10%
79 ms
656 ms
58 ms
45 ms
51 ms
Our browser made a total of 125 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Eraser.us, 62% (78 requests) were made to Removery.com and 5% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (656 ms) relates to the external source Removery.com.
Page size can be reduced by 171.0 kB (11%)
1.6 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Eraser.us main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 907.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 159.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 159.6 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 38 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Eraser images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 11.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 442 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eraser.us has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 76 (66%)
115
39
The browser has sent 115 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eraser. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 59 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
eraser.us
79 ms
removery.com
656 ms
phone-picker.css
58 ms
phone-picker.css
45 ms
style.min.css
51 ms
style.min.css
21 ms
style.css
22 ms
wprevpro_w3.css
47 ms
jquery.min.js
57 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
57 ms
language-cookie.js
56 ms
script.min.js
57 ms
core.min.js
47 ms
mouse.min.js
60 ms
resizable.min.js
58 ms
draggable.min.js
58 ms
controlgroup.min.js
58 ms
checkboxradio.min.js
61 ms
button.min.js
59 ms
dialog.min.js
132 ms
intlTelInput-jquery.js
132 ms
authy.js
130 ms
twilio.js
136 ms
api.js
130 ms
wprev-public.min.js
138 ms
wprs-combined.min.js
137 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
140 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
148 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
140 ms
dom-ready.min.js
142 ms
hooks.min.js
142 ms
i18n.min.js
145 ms
a11y.min.js
146 ms
jquery.json.min.js
146 ms
gravityforms.min.js
146 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
144 ms
utils.min.js
167 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
167 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
170 ms
frontend.min.js
157 ms
css2
51 ms
gtm.js
211 ms
en_18x12.png
55 ms
Australia-Flag-PNG.png
42 ms
en-ca.png
72 ms
icon-phone.svg
59 ms
Tattoo_removal_Expert.webp
61 ms
icon-zoom.svg
62 ms
Screenshot-2023-08-25-at-11.22.45-AM.jpg
61 ms
Screenshot-2023-08-25-at-11.23.01-AM.jpg
63 ms
LOTR-tattoo-removal-before-1.jpg
159 ms
LOTR-tattoo-removal-after-1.jpg
163 ms
Lizard-green-tattoo-removal-before-1.jpg
161 ms
Lizard-green-tattoo-removal-after-1.jpg
162 ms
Texas-Neck-Tattoo-removal-before.jpg
161 ms
Texas-Neck-Tattoo-removal-after.jpg
166 ms
lt-background.png
164 ms
lt-background-rectangle-t1.png
163 ms
k3k6o8UDI-1M0wlSV9XAw6lQkqWY8Q82sJaRE-NWIDdgffTTajNp8A.ttf
67 ms
k3k6o8UDI-1M0wlSV9XAw6lQkqWY8Q82sJaRE-NWIDdgffTTNDNp8A.ttf
67 ms
k3k6o8UDI-1M0wlSV9XAw6lQkqWY8Q82sJaRE-NWIDdgffTT0zRp8A.ttf
157 ms
lt-full-background.png
160 ms
Tattoo_Removal_Experts.webp
224 ms
recaptcha__en.js
58 ms
how-tattoo-removal-works_small.jpg
155 ms
why_the_picolaser_is_better_small.jpg
156 ms
removery_experts_07_bill_1-1_small.jpg
152 ms
rightSideCubes.png
153 ms
leftSideCubes.png
152 ms
Removery_Icons_1-16.png
153 ms
Removery_Icons_1-17.png
151 ms
Removery_Icons_1-18.png
153 ms
Removery_Icons_1-19.png
149 ms
Tattoo_removal_expert_Carmen.webp
149 ms
Tattoo_removal_physician_Weitz.webp
151 ms
Tattoo_removal_physician_Kwan.webp
212 ms
Tattoo_Removal_Zarah.webp
136 ms
Imbarrassing_Tattoo_removal_Stephan.webp
135 ms
coverup-redemption.jpg
130 ms
Ex_Boyfriend_Tattoo_Removal.webp
130 ms
Wrist.Tattoo.Removal.webp
190 ms
findCubes.png
123 ms
icon-search-white.svg
122 ms
Tattoo-removed-Zarah.jpg
124 ms
bg-squares.png
117 ms
anchor
81 ms
ABCSocialExtended-Bold.woff
46 ms
styles__ltr.css
90 ms
recaptcha__en.js
93 ms
js
157 ms
fbevents.js
184 ms
analytics.js
214 ms
destination
211 ms
destination
208 ms
bat.js
312 ms
core.js
321 ms
swap.js
318 ms
roundtrip.js
298 ms
events.js
368 ms
j4g1rsa50q
305 ms
sLPIoIr_9R2H1vFE63bCW9_RmUPMbLk-XyKwDAco0G4.js
137 ms
webworker.js
260 ms
logo_48.png
124 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
81 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
83 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
173 ms
2900128430029713
173 ms
collect
59 ms
collect
124 ms
recaptcha__en.js
23 ms
clarity.js
78 ms
56289446.js
59 ms
external_forms.js
108 ms
swap_session.json
191 ms
ga-audiences
58 ms
56289446
60 ms
6KYPLHDOBRCQBKEPSVXHDQ
69 ms
out
12 ms
S7LOZYBMLFBOJO2G5S5WYA
27 ms
setuid
172 ms
icap.js
34 ms
iMAWebCookie.js
36 ms
42 ms
PolyfillsModule.js
44 ms
c.gif
7 ms
eraser.us accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
eraser.us best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
eraser.us SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eraser.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eraser.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eraser.us
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Eraser. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: