2.3 sec in total
199 ms
1.6 sec
470 ms
Click here to check amazing Erazel content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about erazel.com
Low-cost website design solutions for small businesses and individuals. Website development, SEO, corporate videos and animations, E-Commerce solutions...
Visit erazel.comWe analyzed Erazel.com page load time and found that the first response time was 199 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
erazel.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
58/100
10%
Value9.3 s
1/100
25%
Value9.1 s
13/100
10%
Value1,710 ms
11/100
30%
Value0.717
7/100
15%
Value11.5 s
18/100
10%
199 ms
440 ms
23 ms
47 ms
47 ms
Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Erazel.com, 81% (17 requests) were made to Erazeldesigns.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Static.cloudflareinsights.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (584 ms) relates to the external source Erazeldesigns.com.
Page size can be reduced by 108.5 kB (49%)
223.0 kB
114.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Erazel.com main page is 223.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 131.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 108.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 108.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 52 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Erazel images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 17 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (42%)
12
7
The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Erazel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
erazel.com
199 ms
www.erazeldesigns.com
440 ms
jquery.min-3.7.1.js
23 ms
email-decode.min.js
47 ms
lazyload.min.js
47 ms
c4b75cb265ca28690b52df68e20ccb3b.js
81 ms
vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015
253 ms
dummy.png
38 ms
css
159 ms
e1b1ef0f7c1f892a0efeab0c68529990.css
67 ms
logo-main.png
309 ms
laptop.png
184 ms
bg-013.jpg
126 ms
main.js
14 ms
font
19 ms
icomoon-elegent-line-icons-32x32.ttf
333 ms
Defaults.woff
401 ms
icomoon-feather-24x24.ttf
302 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
459 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
322 ms
icomoon-free-social-contact-16x16.ttf
584 ms
erazel.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
erazel.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
erazel.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Erazel.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Erazel.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
erazel.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Erazel. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: