Tools & Wizards About Us
erebar.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 83

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

erebar.com

Rebar Software - SHEAR 97, ShearCAD

Page Load Speed

858 ms in total

First Response

173 ms

Resources Loaded

591 ms

Page Rendered

94 ms

erebar.com screenshot

About Website

Visit erebar.com now to see the best up-to-date E Rebar content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about erebar.com

SHEAR 97 provides Rebar Software for Fabricators, Detailers, and Estimators.

Visit erebar.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Erebar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 173 ms and then it took 685 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

erebar.com performance score

83

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

50/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

67/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value150 ms

94/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.3 s

84/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

erebar.com

173 ms

analytics.js

20 ms

jquery-3.4.1.slim.min.js

43 ms

popper.min.js

51 ms

bootstrap.min.css

313 ms

Our browser made a total of 10 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Erebar.com, 20% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 10% (1 request) were made to Code.jquery.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (313 ms) belongs to the original domain Erebar.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 207.3 kB (75%)

Content Size

277.7 kB

After Optimization

70.4 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Erebar.com main page is 277.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 163.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 6.8 kB

  • Original 9.6 kB
  • After minification 7.4 kB
  • After compression 2.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.2 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.8 kB or 71% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 61.3 kB

  • Original 104.4 kB
  • After minification 104.4 kB
  • After compression 43.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 61.3 kB or 59% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 139.2 kB

  • Original 163.8 kB
  • After minification 163.4 kB
  • After compression 24.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Erebar.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 139.2 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (44%)

Requests Now

9

After Optimization

5

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of E Rebar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

erebar.com

erebar.com

173 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

20 ms

jquery-3.4.1.slim.min.js

jquery-3.4.1.slim.min.js

43 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

51 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

313 ms

styles.css

styles.css

161 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

262 ms

collect

collect

30 ms

js

js

68 ms

logo.gif

logo.gif

78 ms

Accessibility Review

erebar.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

erebar.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

erebar.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Erebar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Erebar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

erebar.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of E Rebar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: