Tools & Wizards About Us
erfm.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

erfm.org

Evangelical Reformed Fellowship - Home

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

219 ms

Resources Loaded

890 ms

Page Rendered

114 ms

erfm.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to erfm.org homepage info - get ready to check Erfm best content right away, or after learning these important things about erfm.org

We are devoted to helping Christians grow in the Christian faith. We are dedicated to Reformed theology and offer instruction on Christian doctrine.

Visit erfm.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Erfm.org page load time and found that the first response time was 219 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

erfm.org performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

13/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.2 s

78/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value790 ms

37/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.1 s

42/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

erfm.org

219 ms

www.erfm.org

250 ms

sites.css

13 ms

fancybox.css

26 ms

main_style.css

103 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 30% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Erfm.org, 43% (10 requests) were made to Cdn2.editmysite.com and 13% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (250 ms) belongs to the original domain Erfm.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 24.7 kB (7%)

Content Size

355.5 kB

After Optimization

330.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Erfm.org main page is 355.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 283.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 21.6 kB

  • Original 28.3 kB
  • After minification 27.7 kB
  • After compression 6.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.6 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 9.7 kB
  • After minification 9.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Erfm images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 283.1 kB
  • After minification 283.1 kB
  • After compression 280.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 196 B

  • Original 34.4 kB
  • After minification 34.4 kB
  • After compression 34.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Erfm.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (55%)

Requests Now

20

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Erfm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

erfm.org

erfm.org

219 ms

www.erfm.org

www.erfm.org

250 ms

sites.css

sites.css

13 ms

fancybox.css

fancybox.css

26 ms

main_style.css

main_style.css

103 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

39 ms

stl.js

stl.js

28 ms

main.js

main.js

29 ms

footerSignup.js

footerSignup.js

25 ms

translate-this.js

translate-this.js

15 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

87 ms

footer-toast-published-image-1.png

footer-toast-published-image-1.png

63 ms

ga.js

ga.js

71 ms

snowday262.js

snowday262.js

53 ms

free-footer-v3.css

free-footer-v3.css

25 ms

body-bg.png

body-bg.png

108 ms

banner-short.jpg

banner-short.jpg

193 ms

rounded.png

rounded.png

112 ms

content-bg.png

content-bg.png

119 ms

logotype.svg

logotype.svg

41 ms

collect

collect

16 ms

sqmarket-medium.woff

sqmarket-medium.woff

7 ms

js

js

68 ms

Accessibility Review

erfm.org accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

erfm.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

erfm.org SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Erfm.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Erfm.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

erfm.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Erfm. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: