Tools & Wizards About Us
ergoflex.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

ergoflex.in

Furniture Manufacturing Company in India | Ergoflex

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

136 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

66 ms

ergoflex.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ergoflex content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ergoflex.in

Crafting Brilliance in Furniture Manufacturing. Explore Smart & Modern Creations from the Leading Furniture Company in India. Elevate Your Space Now!

Visit ergoflex.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Ergoflex.in page load time and found that the first response time was 136 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ergoflex.in performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.3 s

29/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,170 ms

21/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.0 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.ergoflex.in

136 ms

minified.js

35 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

67 ms

polyfill.min.js

1534 ms

js

72 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ergoflex.in, 39% (29 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 18% (13 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 951.0 kB (52%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

891.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Ergoflex.in main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 963.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 780.3 kB

  • Original 963.1 kB
  • After minification 960.8 kB
  • After compression 182.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 780.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 86.3 kB

  • Original 513.3 kB
  • After minification 427.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ergoflex needs image optimization as it can save up to 86.3 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 84.4 kB

  • Original 365.6 kB
  • After minification 365.6 kB
  • After compression 281.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 84.4 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (31%)

Requests Now

72

After Optimization

50

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ergoflex. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.ergoflex.in

www.ergoflex.in

136 ms

minified.js

minified.js

35 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

67 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

1534 ms

js

js

72 ms

js

js

153 ms

thunderbolt-commons.7700cd07.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.7700cd07.bundle.min.js

47 ms

main.16c08821.bundle.min.js

main.16c08821.bundle.min.js

46 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

47 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

51 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

49 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

51 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

49 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

129 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

130 ms

Ergoflex%20Final.jpg

Ergoflex%20Final.jpg

384 ms

3b2234_1500d5ad014041cb849b5b70deb9cc6e~mv2.jpg

3b2234_1500d5ad014041cb849b5b70deb9cc6e~mv2.jpg

644 ms

3b2234_c26b6fa84cdb4973836368ea60cf6c3e~mv2.jpg

3b2234_c26b6fa84cdb4973836368ea60cf6c3e~mv2.jpg

530 ms

3b2234_644350bd32184e4988fb3264726748e6~mv2.jpg

3b2234_644350bd32184e4988fb3264726748e6~mv2.jpg

647 ms

Wardrobe.png

Wardrobe.png

630 ms

Bed.png

Bed.png

646 ms

sofa-1-revised.jpg

sofa-1-revised.jpg

635 ms

TV%20unit%20-%20revised.jpg

TV%20unit%20-%20revised.jpg

764 ms

1-1-revised.jpg

1-1-revised.jpg

786 ms

Executive%20table%20revised.png

Executive%20table%20revised.png

891 ms

3-revised.jpg

3-revised.jpg

783 ms

Locker%20revised.jpg

Locker%20revised.jpg

853 ms

School-desk-revised.jpg

School-desk-revised.jpg

888 ms

Andres-Audi-Chair-1-revised.jpg

Andres-Audi-Chair-1-revised.jpg

913 ms

LAB1-revised.jpg

LAB1-revised.jpg

1054 ms

library-revised.jpg

library-revised.jpg

1033 ms

beazy-pMY1mpaaUAs-unsplash-revised.jpg

beazy-pMY1mpaaUAs-unsplash-revised.jpg

991 ms

Download%20strip%202%20copy.jpg

Download%20strip%202%20copy.jpg

1055 ms

mernino_updated_logo.png

mernino_updated_logo.png

1056 ms

haefele_logo.png

haefele_logo.png

1068 ms

growever.png

growever.png

1134 ms

greenply-logo.png

greenply-logo.png

1159 ms

glass%20saint%20gobain%20logo.png

glass%20saint%20gobain%20logo.png

1244 ms

Aditya%20Birla%20Hindalco.jpeg

Aditya%20Birla%20Hindalco.jpeg

1288 ms

Aditya%20Birla%20Minacs.jpg

Aditya%20Birla%20Minacs.jpg

1196 ms

Ambuja%20Cement.jpeg

Ambuja%20Cement.jpeg

1179 ms

Apollo%20Gleneagles.jpeg

Apollo%20Gleneagles.jpeg

1255 ms

Belle%20Vue%20Clinic.png

Belle%20Vue%20Clinic.png

1331 ms

India-stamp.png

India-stamp.png

1383 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

280 ms

tiny_arrows.4355fe50.png

tiny_arrows.4355fe50.png

194 ms

274 ms

264 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

159 ms

8281507381919580

8281507381919580

112 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

52 ms

54 ms

87 ms

115 ms

112 ms

114 ms

112 ms

112 ms

109 ms

154 ms

154 ms

150 ms

152 ms

150 ms

149 ms

collect

collect

27 ms

52 ms

905220167110152

905220167110152

103 ms

js

js

70 ms

326577712345328

326577712345328

103 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

9 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

27 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

6 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

5 ms

Accessibility Review

ergoflex.in accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

ergoflex.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ergoflex.in SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ergoflex.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ergoflex.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ergoflex.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ergoflex. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: