Tools & Wizards About Us
ergonomics.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 95

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

ergonomics.org

Ergonomics of the Self - Posture, Movement and Your Inner Ergonomics - Ergonomics of the Self - Posture, Motion and Your Inner Ergonomics

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

1 sec

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

118 ms

ergonomics.org screenshot

About Website

Visit ergonomics.org now to see the best up-to-date Ergonomics content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ergonomics.org

We frequently blame poorly designed work stations, cars, sofas and other equipment and furniture for our aches and pains. Good ergonomics, however, only solves part of the equation. Often the missing ...

Visit ergonomics.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Ergonomics.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ergonomics.org performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.3 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.054

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.7 s

46/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ergonomics.org

1010 ms

google-fonts.min.css

11 ms

style.min.css

13 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

8 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

13 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Ergonomics.org, 4% (1 request) were made to Stats.wp.com and 4% (1 request) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Ergonomics.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 459.0 kB (58%)

Content Size

789.3 kB

After Optimization

330.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ergonomics.org main page is 789.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 382.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 37.1 kB

  • Original 48.6 kB
  • After minification 47.1 kB
  • After compression 11.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.1 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 17.7 kB

  • Original 216.2 kB
  • After minification 198.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ergonomics images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 94.4 kB

  • Original 142.6 kB
  • After minification 137.9 kB
  • After compression 48.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 94.4 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 309.8 kB

  • Original 382.0 kB
  • After minification 378.8 kB
  • After compression 72.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ergonomics.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 309.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (71%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ergonomics. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ergonomics.org

ergonomics.org

1010 ms

google-fonts.min.css

google-fonts.min.css

11 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

13 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

8 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

13 ms

bootstrap-tooltip.css

bootstrap-tooltip.css

12 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

16 ms

widget-options.css

widget-options.css

16 ms

atw-posts-style.min.css

atw-posts-style.min.css

17 ms

fonts.min.css

fonts.min.css

17 ms

style-weaverx.min.css

style-weaverx.min.css

19 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

20 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

19 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

14 ms

weaverxjslib.min.js

weaverxjslib.min.js

36 ms

bootstrap-tooltip.js

bootstrap-tooltip.js

39 ms

ergonomics-from-the-inside-out-2.png

ergonomics-from-the-inside-out-2.png

13 ms

weaverxjslib-end.min.js

weaverxjslib-end.min.js

7 ms

e-202434.js

e-202434.js

13 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

7 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

7 ms

Genericons.svg

Genericons.svg

15 ms

8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgjO2i86D6AshzNIwGgBAmQUAAAA=

8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgjO2i86D6AshzNIwGgBAmQUAAAA=

1 ms

Accessibility Review

ergonomics.org accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

ergonomics.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

ergonomics.org SEO score

95

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ergonomics.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ergonomics.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ergonomics.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ergonomics. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: