Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

ernestopage.com

球探网-官网

Page Load Speed

8.6 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

7.1 sec

Page Rendered

282 ms

ernestopage.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ernestopage content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ernestopage.com

球探网【99273.com】国内最安全、彩种齐全的网上购买彩票平台、注册充值即送彩金,球探网本站专注线上购彩多年,资深玩家众多,在这里你能够在线看到超多的精准计划!

Visit ernestopage.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ernestopage.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 7.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ernestopage.com performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.4 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.2 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value260 ms

83/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.0 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.ernestopage.com

1185 ms

A.style.css.pagespeed.cf.9JSjE3qDuQ.css

22 ms

A.custom.css,qver=1.0.pagespeed.cf.TaPdPkZipo.css

217 ms

A.screen.css,qver=1.0.pagespeed.cf.9JSjE3qDuQ.css

45 ms

A.jquery.fancybox-1.3.0.css,qver=1.0.pagespeed.cf.wiqrlYn8ba.css

49 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Ernestopage.com, 9% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Ernestopage.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 388.2 kB (23%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Ernestopage.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 45.0 kB

  • Original 79.7 kB
  • After minification 78.0 kB
  • After compression 34.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.0 kB or 56% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 7.6 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ernestopage images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 251.9 kB

  • Original 414.5 kB
  • After minification 412.5 kB
  • After compression 162.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 251.9 kB or 61% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 83.6 kB

  • Original 104.5 kB
  • After minification 104.1 kB
  • After compression 20.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ernestopage.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 83.6 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (59%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

23

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ernestopage. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

ernestopage.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ernestopage.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

ernestopage.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ernestopage.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Ernestopage.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ernestopage. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: