Tools & Wizards About Us
errigalcomputers.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

errigalcomputers.com

KFO

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

593 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

1.4 sec

errigalcomputers.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Errigalcomputers content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about errigalcomputers.com

Killybegs Fishermen's Organisation, Killybegs, Co Donegal, Irlenad.

Visit errigalcomputers.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Errigalcomputers.com page load time and found that the first response time was 593 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

errigalcomputers.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.2 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.4 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,520 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.5 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

errigalcomputers.com

593 ms

site_global.css

185 ms

master_a-master.css

184 ms

index.css

288 ms

josefin-sans:n6:all.js

6 ms

Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 32% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Errigalcomputers.com, 14% (12 requests) were made to Cdn2.editmysite.com and 13% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (777 ms) belongs to the original domain Errigalcomputers.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 272.3 kB (23%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

905.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Errigalcomputers.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 708.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 34.6 kB

  • Original 44.7 kB
  • After minification 36.4 kB
  • After compression 10.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.3 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.6 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 12.9 kB

  • Original 359.2 kB
  • After minification 346.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Errigalcomputers images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 198.8 kB

  • Original 708.2 kB
  • After minification 707.3 kB
  • After compression 509.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 198.8 kB or 28% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 26.0 kB

  • Original 66.0 kB
  • After minification 64.8 kB
  • After compression 39.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Errigalcomputers.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 26.0 kB or 39% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (55%)

Requests Now

69

After Optimization

31

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Errigalcomputers. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

errigalcomputers.com

errigalcomputers.com

593 ms

site_global.css

site_global.css

185 ms

master_a-master.css

master_a-master.css

184 ms

index.css

index.css

288 ms

josefin-sans:n6:all.js

josefin-sans:n6:all.js

6 ms

require.js

require.js

448 ms

output

output

120 ms

kfonews.weebly.com

kfonews.weebly.com

147 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

192 ms

kfo-logo-u753.png

kfo-logo-u753.png

288 ms

nwwac%20logo.jpg

nwwac%20logo.jpg

95 ms

prac%20logo.jpg

prac%20logo.jpg

205 ms

ldrac%20logo.jpg

ldrac%20logo.jpg

353 ms

eapo%20logo.jpg

eapo%20logo.jpg

234 ms

ldrac%20logo88x63.jpg

ldrac%20logo88x63.jpg

305 ms

arrow11-u1424.png

arrow11-u1424.png

317 ms

photo%20-%20sean%20o%20donoghue.jpg

photo%20-%20sean%20o%20donoghue.jpg

777 ms

linkedin-u527.png

linkedin-u527.png

378 ms

kfo-logo-u771.png

kfo-logo-u771.png

776 ms

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

8 ms

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

728 ms

kfonews.weebly.com

kfonews.weebly.com

260 ms

sites.css

sites.css

58 ms

fancybox.css

fancybox.css

67 ms

main_style.css

main_style.css

137 ms

css

css

34 ms

css

css

49 ms

css

css

67 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

22 ms

stl.js

stl.js

72 ms

main.js

main.js

75 ms

footerSignup.js

footerSignup.js

6 ms

main-customer-accounts-site.js

main-customer-accounts-site.js

12 ms

bg_feed.gif

bg_feed.gif

232 ms

footer-toast-published-image-1.png

footer-toast-published-image-1.png

108 ms

teal_icons.png

teal_icons.png

259 ms

199 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrQ.ttf

175 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrQ.ttf

181 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrQ.ttf

220 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrQ.ttf

220 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

221 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

219 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

221 ms

OpNCnoEEmtHa6GcArgs.ttf

OpNCnoEEmtHa6GcArgs.ttf

222 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWV4exQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWV4exQ.ttf

224 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWV4exQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWV4exQ.ttf

223 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWV4exQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWV4exQ.ttf

222 ms

ga.js

ga.js

138 ms

snowday262.js

snowday262.js

89 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

172 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

281 ms

free-footer-v3.css

free-footer-v3.css

73 ms

museconfig.js

museconfig.js

204 ms

logotype.svg

logotype.svg

24 ms

sqmarket-medium.woff

sqmarket-medium.woff

24 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

27 ms

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

53 ms

museutils.js

museutils.js

465 ms

whatinput.js

whatinput.js

124 ms

jquery.musemenu.js

jquery.musemenu.js

124 ms

webpro.js

webpro.js

313 ms

musewpslideshow.js

musewpslideshow.js

236 ms

jquery.museoverlay.js

jquery.museoverlay.js

125 ms

touchswipe.js

touchswipe.js

234 ms

jquery.watch.js

jquery.watch.js

234 ms

settings

settings

134 ms

like.php

like.php

134 ms

like.php

like.php

154 ms

like.php

like.php

211 ms

like.php

like.php

218 ms

like.php

like.php

201 ms

like.php

like.php

283 ms

like.php

like.php

470 ms

like.php

like.php

311 ms

like.php

like.php

354 ms

like.php

like.php

283 ms

tp2

tp2

139 ms

button.856debeac157d9669cf51e73a08fbc93.js

button.856debeac157d9669cf51e73a08fbc93.js

75 ms

AcAvebb33yC.js

AcAvebb33yC.js

34 ms

FEppCFCt76d.png

FEppCFCt76d.png

38 ms

embeds

embeds

36 ms

embeds

embeds

99 ms

embeds

embeds

104 ms

tweet_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.en.html

tweet_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.en.html

78 ms

slider2.jpg

slider2.jpg

651 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

133 ms

Accessibility Review

errigalcomputers.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

errigalcomputers.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

errigalcomputers.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Errigalcomputers.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Errigalcomputers.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

errigalcomputers.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Errigalcomputers. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: