Tools & Wizards About Us
escateq.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

escateq.com

EscaTEQ | Escalators get dirty. EscaTEQ makes cleaning them easy.

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

235 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

458 ms

escateq.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing EscaTEQ content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about escateq.com

EscaTEQ is your specialist in escalator cleaning tools. An one-person operational system designed to clean an escalator in just a few minutes.

Visit escateq.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Escateq.com page load time and found that the first response time was 235 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

escateq.com performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

75/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

93/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.7 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,600 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.8 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

escateq.com

235 ms

escateq.com

333 ms

styles.css

19 ms

style.css

322 ms

toolbar.css

332 ms

Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Escateq.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (833 ms) belongs to the original domain Escateq.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 215.2 kB (27%)

Content Size

782.9 kB

After Optimization

567.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Escateq.com main page is 782.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 400.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 204.5 kB

  • Original 241.9 kB
  • After minification 232.4 kB
  • After compression 37.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 204.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 63.8 kB
  • After minification 63.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EscaTEQ images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 10.2 kB

  • Original 400.4 kB
  • After minification 400.4 kB
  • After compression 390.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 609 B

  • Original 76.8 kB
  • After minification 76.6 kB
  • After compression 76.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Escateq.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (87%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EscaTEQ. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

escateq.com

escateq.com

235 ms

escateq.com

escateq.com

333 ms

styles.css

styles.css

19 ms

style.css

style.css

322 ms

toolbar.css

toolbar.css

332 ms

wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css

wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css

22 ms

flatsome.css

flatsome.css

485 ms

flatsome-shop.css

flatsome-shop.css

28 ms

style.css

style.css

30 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

552 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

41 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

50 ms

add-to-cart.min.js

add-to-cart.min.js

69 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

480 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

21 ms

intlTelInput.min.css

intlTelInput.min.css

38 ms

index.js

index.js

49 ms

index.js

index.js

58 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

71 ms

element.js

element.js

73 ms

8016966.js

8016966.js

95 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

81 ms

wpcf7r-fe.js

wpcf7r-fe.js

90 ms

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

100 ms

flatsome-live-search.js

flatsome-live-search.js

109 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

118 ms

api.js

api.js

79 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

130 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

140 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

155 ms

index.js

index.js

166 ms

smush-lazy-load.min.js

smush-lazy-load.min.js

178 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

187 ms

flatsome.js

flatsome.js

199 ms

woocommerce.js

woocommerce.js

211 ms

v2.js

v2.js

68 ms

intlTelInput.min.js

intlTelInput.min.js

833 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

833 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

369 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

364 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aXx-p7K4GLs.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aXx-p7K4GLs.woff

350 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff

349 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w2aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w2aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff

350 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w9aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w9aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff

366 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w0aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w0aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff

349 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXx-p7K4GLs.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXx-p7K4GLs.woff

349 ms

font

font

495 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw2aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw2aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff

750 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw9aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw9aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff

752 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw0aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw0aXx-p7K4GLvztg.woff

752 ms

fl-icons.ttf

fl-icons.ttf

752 ms

iconfinder_logo_brand_brands_logos_translate_google_2993668-1-e1616861146978.png

iconfinder_logo_brand_brands_logos_translate_google_2993668-1-e1616861146978.png

709 ms

8016966.js

8016966.js

340 ms

fb.js

fb.js

251 ms

collectedforms.js

collectedforms.js

338 ms

banner.js

banner.js

341 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

248 ms

json

json

279 ms

ESCATEQ-logo-wit.png

ESCATEQ-logo-wit.png

545 ms

flags.png

flags.png

797 ms

anchor

anchor

56 ms

styles__ltr.css

styles__ltr.css

9 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

14 ms

722MIWu_TMZiQau3mAaarHtCk2pd6rTYw5oNsH4wR_g.js

722MIWu_TMZiQau3mAaarHtCk2pd6rTYw5oNsH4wR_g.js

44 ms

webworker.js

webworker.js

100 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

29 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

64 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

66 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

66 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

33 ms

Accessibility Review

escateq.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

escateq.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

escateq.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Escateq.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Escateq.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

escateq.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of EscaTEQ. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: