Tools & Wizards About Us
escombrakes.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

escombrakes.com

Brake Linings and Friction Materials - Escom Brakes

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

62 ms

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

224 ms

escombrakes.com screenshot

About Website

Visit escombrakes.com now to see the best up-to-date Escom Brakes content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about escombrakes.com

Production of brake linings and the processing of friction materials for braking systems: contact us for a quote!

Visit escombrakes.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Escombrakes.com page load time and found that the first response time was 62 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

escombrakes.com performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.9 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value710 ms

42/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.085

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.9 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

escombrakes.com

62 ms

escombrakes.com

267 ms

www.escombrakes.com

755 ms

gtm.js

79 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

275 ms

Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Escombrakes.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Escombrakes.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 54.7 kB (9%)

Content Size

622.7 kB

After Optimization

568.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Escombrakes.com main page is 622.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 242.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 44.2 kB

  • Original 57.2 kB
  • After minification 54.8 kB
  • After compression 12.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.2 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 225 B

  • Original 226.2 kB
  • After minification 226.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Escom Brakes images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.5 kB

  • Original 242.7 kB
  • After minification 242.5 kB
  • After compression 240.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 7.8 kB

  • Original 96.7 kB
  • After minification 94.7 kB
  • After compression 88.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Escombrakes.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (72%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Escom Brakes. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

escombrakes.com

escombrakes.com

62 ms

escombrakes.com

escombrakes.com

267 ms

www.escombrakes.com

www.escombrakes.com

755 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

79 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

275 ms

formidablepro.css

formidablepro.css

363 ms

slick.css

slick.css

289 ms

settings.css

settings.css

284 ms

style.css

style.css

286 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

283 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

544 ms

featherlight.min.css

featherlight.min.css

550 ms

featherlight.gallery.min.css

featherlight.gallery.min.css

547 ms

reset.css

reset.css

551 ms

theme.css

theme.css

559 ms

lf.css

lf.css

628 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

822 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

823 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

967 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

908 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

834 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

892 ms

elements.js

elements.js

1091 ms

js

js

67 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

1097 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

1183 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

1235 ms

altimage.js

altimage.js

1173 ms

css

css

32 ms

css

css

63 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

995 ms

effect.min.js

effect.min.js

1231 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

1364 ms

featherlight.min.js

featherlight.min.js

1362 ms

featherlight.gallery.min.js

featherlight.gallery.min.js

1438 ms

main.js

main.js

1456 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

1495 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

1490 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

1629 ms

css

css

62 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

64 ms

footer-image.jpg

footer-image.jpg

144 ms

logo.png

logo.png

136 ms

beral-logo.png

beral-logo.png

159 ms

it.png

it.png

169 ms

en.png

en.png

181 ms

german.png

german.png

196 ms

fr.png

fr.png

203 ms

esp.png

esp.png

210 ms

rus.png

rus.png

217 ms

slidehome.jpg

slidehome.jpg

225 ms

hp-guarnizioni-box-1.jpg

hp-guarnizioni-box-1.jpg

224 ms

hp-rotoli-box-1.jpg

hp-rotoli-box-1.jpg

230 ms

hp-guarnizioni-2-1.jpg

hp-guarnizioni-2-1.jpg

235 ms

Anelli-dischi-rondelle-e-particolari-a-disegno-2.jpg

Anelli-dischi-rondelle-e-particolari-a-disegno-2.jpg

238 ms

hp-lastre-box-1.jpg

hp-lastre-box-1.jpg

241 ms

hp-lastre-2-1.jpg

hp-lastre-2-1.jpg

252 ms

TK3-WkYFABsmjuBtFuvTIFRAPpWs-H08pmFC.ttf

TK3-WkYFABsmjuBtFuvTIFRAPpWs-H08pmFC.ttf

54 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

639 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

493 ms

collect

collect

16 ms

js

js

54 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

266 ms

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

270 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

4 ms

main.js

main.js

10 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

273 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

17 ms

fontawesome-webfont.svg

fontawesome-webfont.svg

271 ms

Accessibility Review

escombrakes.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

escombrakes.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

escombrakes.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Escombrakes.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Escombrakes.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

escombrakes.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Escom Brakes. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: