4 sec in total
272 ms
3.5 sec
192 ms
Welcome to esecurity.com.br homepage info - get ready to check ESecurity best content for Brazil right away, or after learning these important things about esecurity.com.br
Somos uma empresa especializada em Segurança Cibernética focada em Serviços e Soluções em Segurança da Informação, Testes de Invasão (Pentest), Treinamentos
Visit esecurity.com.brWe analyzed Esecurity.com.br page load time and found that the first response time was 272 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
esecurity.com.br performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value12.8 s
0/100
25%
Value10.7 s
7/100
10%
Value2,140 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.187
65/100
15%
Value14.1 s
9/100
10%
272 ms
1178 ms
53 ms
74 ms
210 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Esecurity.com.br, 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Esecurity.com.br.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (70%)
1.9 MB
568.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Esecurity.com.br main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 893.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 44.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.5 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 292.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, ESecurity needs image optimization as it can save up to 292.3 kB or 64% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 579.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 579.9 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 385.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Esecurity.com.br needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 385.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (68%)
71
23
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ESecurity. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
esecurity.com.br
272 ms
www.esecurity.com.br
1178 ms
cloudflare.min.js
53 ms
css
74 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.css
210 ms
jquery-ui-spinner.css
214 ms
calendar-jos.css
199 ms
form_maker_frontend.css
198 ms
grid.css
206 ms
base.css
219 ms
layout.css
783 ms
shortcodes.css
346 ms
magnific-popup.css
372 ms
mediaelementplayer.css
367 ms
enfold.css
372 ms
custom.css
762 ms
layerslider.css
490 ms
jquery.js
514 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
509 ms
js
65 ms
if_gmap_front_end.js
496 ms
jelly.min.js
650 ms
file-upload.js
662 ms
calendar.js
676 ms
calendar_function.js
678 ms
avia-compat.js
816 ms
greensock.js
815 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
1285 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
857 ms
widget.min.js
854 ms
core.min.js
899 ms
mouse.min.js
915 ms
slider.min.js
942 ms
button.min.js
1205 ms
spinner.min.js
1021 ms
effect.min.js
1078 ms
effect-shake.min.js
1085 ms
avia.js
1111 ms
shortcodes.js
1196 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
1201 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
1293 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
1175 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1249 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1237 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1267 ms
analytics.js
63 ms
ga.js
90 ms
logo1.png
221 ms
slide15.jpg
282 ms
iso.jpg
220 ms
formacao.jpg
281 ms
pentest.jpg
279 ms
wifi.png
279 ms
jj1.jpg
281 ms
sirva.png
313 ms
grupo_rai.png
408 ms
CARBRINK.png
373 ms
inactu.png
414 ms
simples.png
414 ms
sinsolution.png
398 ms
viladivino.png
469 ms
reckitt.png
512 ms
barry1.jpg
529 ms
entypo-fontello.woff
563 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
72 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
74 ms
WidgetScript
362 ms
collect
26 ms
collect
25 ms
__utm.gif
34 ms
skin.css
418 ms
_WidgetJPCB0
81 ms
_WidgetJPCB1.js
68 ms
jquery.min.js
59 ms
print.css
156 ms
147285691458255940421.js
10 ms
esecurity.com.br accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
esecurity.com.br best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
esecurity.com.br SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
PT
PT
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Esecurity.com.br can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Portuguese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Esecurity.com.br main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
esecurity.com.br
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of ESecurity. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: