7.3 sec in total
542 ms
6.3 sec
494 ms
Click here to check amazing Esfield content for Japan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about esfield.net
「良質生活委員会(本店)」を2022年10月31日(月)にて終了することとなりました。永らくご愛顧いただきましたこと厚く御礼申し上げます。
Visit esfield.netWe analyzed Esfield.net page load time and found that the first response time was 542 ms and then it took 6.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
esfield.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
33/100
10%
Value10.2 s
0/100
25%
Value7.1 s
31/100
10%
Value20 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.187
65/100
15%
Value3.8 s
89/100
10%
542 ms
804 ms
338 ms
555 ms
77 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Esfield.net, 21% (15 requests) were made to Image1.shopserve.jp and 3% (2 requests) were made to Stats.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.5 sec) relates to the external source Image1.shopserve.jp.
Page size can be reduced by 421.9 kB (18%)
2.4 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Esfield.net main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 77.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.3 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.0 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 239.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Esfield needs image optimization as it can save up to 239.9 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 17.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 17.2 kB or 44% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 87.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Esfield.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 87.8 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (49%)
67
34
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Esfield. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
esfield.net
542 ms
www.esfield.net
804 ms
sps_common.css
338 ms
default.css
555 ms
jquery.min.js
77 ms
jquery.tile.js
379 ms
jquery.distile.js
372 ms
pcsmpflg.js
352 ms
cal.js
338 ms
dc.js
52 ms
tit_shoplogo.png
360 ms
prod_o024.jpg
1344 ms
header_bg.gif
331 ms
t_search.jpg
367 ms
submitSearch.gif
373 ms
icon_new.png
406 ms
rank1.png
390 ms
rank2.png
406 ms
rank3.png
686 ms
rank4.png
722 ms
rank5.png
741 ms
footer_info.png
1330 ms
icon_pickup.png
768 ms
rss.gif
785 ms
pagetop.gif
1065 ms
product_u004.jpg
1943 ms
product_u006.jpg
1820 ms
prod_es060.jpg
1399 ms
prod_nt001_2.jpg
1852 ms
prod_nt002.jpg
1560 ms
prod_w001_1.jpg
2853 ms
prod_es053.jpg
2837 ms
prod_es041.jpg
2714 ms
prod_ag011.jpg
3031 ms
prod_st003.jpg
3592 ms
prod_st010.jpg
3112 ms
prod_es038.jpg
3917 ms
prod_r002.jpg
4034 ms
prod_sl007.jpg
4493 ms
top_201512_hco.jpg
1914 ms
side_phone.jpg
366 ms
side_bnr_member.png
708 ms
side_bnr_sale2015.png
712 ms
side_banner_sp.png
746 ms
searchbox.gif
1019 ms
slash_000.gif
1048 ms
Title-news.gif
1101 ms
Tline-news.gif
1084 ms
Title-new.gif
1387 ms
Tline-new.gif
1366 ms
Title-ranking.gif
1413 ms
Tline-ranking.gif
1459 ms
Title-group.gif
1477 ms
Tline-group.gif
1652 ms
Title-category.gif
1743 ms
Tline-category.gif
1765 ms
Tline-shop.gif
1759 ms
tracking.php
922 ms
Tline-scolumn.gif
1835 ms
Title-pickup.gif
1838 ms
Tline-pickup.gif
1998 ms
inpage_linkid.js
9 ms
BGline-scolumn.gif
2049 ms
Title-scolumn_calendar.gif
2073 ms
calendar_pleft.gif
2063 ms
calendar_pright.gif
2133 ms
footer_bg.gif
2182 ms
slash_ccc.gif
2304 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
side_phone.jpg
2702 ms
esfield.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
esfield.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
esfield.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
JA
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Esfield.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Esfield.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
esfield.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Esfield. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: