10.3 sec in total
202 ms
9.5 sec
638 ms
Welcome to esg.glass homepage info - get ready to check ESG best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about esg.glass
ESG are the UK's leading glass processors - our products range from switchable glass through to toughened, sound proof, ballistic and more.
Visit esg.glassWe analyzed Esg.glass page load time and found that the first response time was 202 ms and then it took 10.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
esg.glass performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
12/100
10%
Value16.1 s
0/100
25%
Value13.1 s
2/100
10%
Value1,230 ms
20/100
30%
Value0.092
91/100
15%
Value17.6 s
4/100
10%
202 ms
673 ms
49 ms
35 ms
2112 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Esg.glass, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Esg-glass.sites.nut247h.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Esg.glass.
Page size can be reduced by 175.5 kB (11%)
1.6 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Esg.glass main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 918.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 106.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 106.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 59.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ESG images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 10.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (66%)
59
20
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ESG. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
esg.glass
202 ms
esg.glass
673 ms
gtm.js
49 ms
css2
35 ms
jquery.min.js
2112 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1031 ms
isotope.min.js
1111 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1018 ms
css
20 ms
shortcodes.js
829 ms
index.js
1025 ms
index.js
1174 ms
rbtools.min.js
1594 ms
rs6.min.js
1753 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
1099 ms
html5shiv.js
1111 ms
respond.min.js
1181 ms
jquery.easing.js
1195 ms
jquery-waypoints.js
1257 ms
matchMedia.js
1264 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
1280 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
1342 ms
owl.carousel.js
1432 ms
main.js
1365 ms
api.js
33 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1425 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1451 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1594 ms
index.js
1520 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
1540 ms
maxmegamenu.js
1606 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1627 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
1678 ms
143283938.js
422 ms
hotjar-5006860.js
133 ms
transparent.png
387 ms
arrows.svg
552 ms
esg.png
388 ms
esg-logomob.png
354 ms
page-title.jpg
667 ms
dummy.png
115 ms
button1.jpg
392 ms
button2.jpg
264 ms
button3.jpg
433 ms
button4.jpg
536 ms
heathrow-terminal2large.jpg
1020 ms
goldsmiths.jpg
609 ms
trafalgar.jpg
1152 ms
Owen.jpg
1019 ms
footlogos.jpg
703 ms
switchable-securvevue.png
695 ms
arrow1.svg
772 ms
footerimg.jpg
960 ms
recaptcha__en.js
92 ms
w8gdH283Tvk__Lua32TysjIfp8uK.ttf
82 ms
fb.png
747 ms
twitter.png
826 ms
in.png
835 ms
143283938.js
449 ms
collectedforms.js
459 ms
banner.js
465 ms
squares.jpg
484 ms
esg.glass accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
esg.glass best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
esg.glass SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Esg.glass can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Esg.glass main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
esg.glass
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of ESG. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: