Tools & Wizards About Us
eshark.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

eshark.in

Shop - 3d hologram fan and Gobo projectors manufacturer

Page Load Speed

5.4 sec in total

First Response

135 ms

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

1.4 sec

eshark.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Eshark content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about eshark.in

The most unique and powerfull advertising technology company in india, We have Gobo lights, 3d hologram fan, 3d bill boards, intractive wall, Emmersive experience room, Projection mapping and more

Visit eshark.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Eshark.in page load time and found that the first response time was 135 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

eshark.in performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

48/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

69/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.0 s

46/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,760 ms

10/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.9 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

eshark.in

135 ms

eshark.in

2357 ms

style.min.css

123 ms

css

46 ms

menu-animation.min.css

183 ms

Our browser made a total of 129 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (89 requests) were addressed to the original Eshark.in, 22% (28 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Eshark.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 247.3 kB (29%)

Content Size

867.2 kB

After Optimization

619.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Eshark.in main page is 867.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 369.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 209.5 kB

  • Original 251.2 kB
  • After minification 243.9 kB
  • After compression 41.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 209.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 37.8 kB

  • Original 369.2 kB
  • After minification 331.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Eshark images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 21 B

  • Original 246.8 kB
  • After minification 246.8 kB
  • After compression 246.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (58%)

Requests Now

99

After Optimization

42

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 99 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eshark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 32 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

eshark.in

eshark.in

135 ms

eshark.in

eshark.in

2357 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

123 ms

css

css

46 ms

menu-animation.min.css

menu-animation.min.css

183 ms

woocommerce-layout.min.css

woocommerce-layout.min.css

187 ms

woocommerce.min.css

woocommerce.min.css

253 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

189 ms

widget-image.min.css

widget-image.min.css

187 ms

widget-icon-box.min.css

widget-icon-box.min.css

192 ms

widget-theme-elements.min.css

widget-theme-elements.min.css

242 ms

widget-nav-menu.min.css

widget-nav-menu.min.css

246 ms

fadeIn.min.css

fadeIn.min.css

248 ms

widget-heading.min.css

widget-heading.min.css

249 ms

fadeInUp.min.css

fadeInUp.min.css

258 ms

widget-divider.min.css

widget-divider.min.css

304 ms

widget-text-editor.min.css

widget-text-editor.min.css

308 ms

e-animation-float.min.css

e-animation-float.min.css

306 ms

widget-social-icons.min.css

widget-social-icons.min.css

307 ms

apple-webkit.min.css

apple-webkit.min.css

308 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

311 ms

e-swiper.min.css

e-swiper.min.css

364 ms

post-2972.css

post-2972.css

370 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

365 ms

global.css

global.css

367 ms

widget-menu-anchor.min.css

widget-menu-anchor.min.css

369 ms

post-3639.css

post-3639.css

372 ms

post-5520.css

post-5520.css

426 ms

post-835.css

post-835.css

425 ms

css

css

44 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

489 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

430 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

430 ms

add-to-cart.min.js

add-to-cart.min.js

432 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

486 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

485 ms

js

js

85 ms

js

js

130 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

104 ms

wc-blocks.css

wc-blocks.css

593 ms

post-5668.css

post-5668.css

594 ms

slideInLeft.min.css

slideInLeft.min.css

595 ms

cashfree.js

cashfree.js

24 ms

style.min.js

style.min.js

682 ms

checkout.js

checkout.js

617 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

558 ms

sourcebuster.min.js

sourcebuster.min.js

551 ms

order-attribution.min.js

order-attribution.min.js

551 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

547 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

549 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

502 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

495 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

494 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

483 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

484 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

628 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

579 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

233 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

230 ms

Tech-15-1.webp

Tech-15-1.webp

338 ms

cropped-Eshark-1-white-1-133x27.png

cropped-Eshark-1-white-1-133x27.png

338 ms

Untitled-design-7.webp

Untitled-design-7.webp

341 ms

4.webp

4.webp

341 ms

6.webp

6.webp

482 ms

5.webp

5.webp

427 ms

7.webp

7.webp

427 ms

Untitled-design-8.webp

Untitled-design-8.webp

430 ms

F52.F56.F60.F65.F80.F100-3-e1720870965765.png

F52.F56.F60.F65.F80.F100-3-e1720870965765.png

589 ms

Tech.webp

Tech.webp

429 ms

Tech-1.webp

Tech-1.webp

482 ms

Tech-3.webp

Tech-3.webp

483 ms

Tech-2.webp

Tech-2.webp

484 ms

Designer.webp

Designer.webp

485 ms

Tech-4.webp

Tech-4.webp

521 ms

14-1.webp

14-1.webp

523 ms

7-1.webp

7-1.webp

525 ms

8.webp

8.webp

533 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

117 ms

9.webp

9.webp

434 ms

10.webp

10.webp

481 ms

11.webp

11.webp

486 ms

12.webp

12.webp

397 ms

13-1.webp

13-1.webp

401 ms

14.webp

14.webp

403 ms

15.webp

15.webp

453 ms

a-boy-standing-in-front-of-an-LED-display-placed-in-the-center-of-a-mall-the-display.webp

a-boy-standing-in-front-of-an-LED-display-placed-in-the-center-of-a-mall-the-display.webp

581 ms

Tech-8.webp

Tech-8.webp

460 ms

Tech-6.webp

Tech-6.webp

459 ms

Tech-7.webp

Tech-7.webp

458 ms

Tech-5.webp

Tech-5.webp

460 ms

Tech-9.webp

Tech-9.webp

510 ms

Tech-10.webp

Tech-10.webp

523 ms

66b8a2cb-2b3a-4040-b604-896439ab49ef.webp

66b8a2cb-2b3a-4040-b604-896439ab49ef.webp

638 ms

Tech-11-min.webp

Tech-11-min.webp

522 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

153 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

154 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

178 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

178 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf

178 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

178 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

177 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

177 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

178 ms

MCoTzAn-1s3IGyJMVacY2g.ttf

MCoTzAn-1s3IGyJMVacY2g.ttf

215 ms

1cXxaUPXBpj2rGoU7C9WiHGA.ttf

1cXxaUPXBpj2rGoU7C9WiHGA.ttf

280 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

178 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

178 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

178 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

214 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

214 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

214 ms

LYjGdGHgj0k1DIQRyUEyyEoodN8.ttf

LYjGdGHgj0k1DIQRyUEyyEoodN8.ttf

279 ms

LYjbdGHgj0k1DIQRyUEyyELbV8_YeJQ.ttf

LYjbdGHgj0k1DIQRyUEyyELbV8_YeJQ.ttf

218 ms

LYjbdGHgj0k1DIQRyUEyyEL3UM_YeJQ.ttf

LYjbdGHgj0k1DIQRyUEyyEL3UM_YeJQ.ttf

219 ms

LYjbdGHgj0k1DIQRyUEyyEKTUc_YeJQ.ttf

LYjbdGHgj0k1DIQRyUEyyEKTUc_YeJQ.ttf

282 ms

LYjbdGHgj0k1DIQRyUEyyEKPUs_YeJQ.ttf

LYjbdGHgj0k1DIQRyUEyyEKPUs_YeJQ.ttf

218 ms

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf

221 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwlxdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwlxdr.ttf

219 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i94_wlxdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i94_wlxdr.ttf

221 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlxdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlxdr.ttf

222 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdr.ttf

222 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3iu4nwlxdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3iu4nwlxdr.ttf

223 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

117 ms

ads

ads

94 ms

Tech-12.webp

Tech-12.webp

381 ms

Tech-13.webp

Tech-13.webp

430 ms

cropped-Eshark-fin-logo-edit-1.png

cropped-Eshark-fin-logo-edit-1.png

438 ms

woocommerce-smallscreen.min.css

woocommerce-smallscreen.min.css

65 ms

sodar

sodar

35 ms

Accessibility Review

eshark.in accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

eshark.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

eshark.in SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eshark.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eshark.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

eshark.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Eshark. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: