4.1 sec in total
493 ms
3.4 sec
219 ms
Visit esiteful.com now to see the best up-to-date ESiteful content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about esiteful.com
At eSiteful, we help clients convert their business and communication challenges into effective, integrated, creative solutions.
Visit esiteful.comWe analyzed Esiteful.com page load time and found that the first response time was 493 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
esiteful.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
22/100
10%
Value13.4 s
0/100
25%
Value10.3 s
8/100
10%
Value1,240 ms
19/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value13.4 s
11/100
10%
493 ms
2343 ms
286 ms
59 ms
52 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Esiteful.com, 20% (18 requests) were made to Rev.esiteful.com and 13% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Esiteful.com.
Page size can be reduced by 244.3 kB (9%)
2.9 MB
2.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Esiteful.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 75.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 160.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ESiteful images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 6.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Esiteful.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.1 kB or 21% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (57%)
72
31
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ESiteful. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
esiteful.com
493 ms
home
2343 ms
GetResource.ashx
286 ms
uc-block.bundle.js
59 ms
loader.js
52 ms
GetResource.ashx
244 ms
GetResource.ashx
214 ms
GetResource.ashx
213 ms
GetResource.ashx
212 ms
GetResource.ashx
397 ms
GetResource.ashx
438 ms
GetResource.ashx
415 ms
GetResource.ashx
422 ms
GetResource.ashx
481 ms
GetResource.ashx
586 ms
WebResource.axd
601 ms
GetResource.ashx
630 ms
ScriptResource.axd
654 ms
ScriptResource.axd
539 ms
settings.css
61 ms
jquery.js
77 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
78 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
75 ms
revolution.addon.whiteboard.min.js
76 ms
font-awesome.css
71 ms
css
65 ms
css
81 ms
css
89 ms
css
87 ms
css
89 ms
font-awesome.min.css
396 ms
css
18 ms
animate.min.css
448 ms
analytics.js
149 ms
gtm.js
150 ms
GetResource.ashx
222 ms
bundle_legacy.js
19 ms
collect
31 ms
js
53 ms
transparent.png
17 ms
d2e15-strategy-board-2.jpg
17 ms
blurflake4.png
18 ms
blurflake3.png
18 ms
blurflake2.png
17 ms
eSiteful_Logo_white.png
152 ms
EnergyCorridor4.jpg
154 ms
ecd-logo.jpg
150 ms
aramcoworld-cover.jpg
152 ms
aramco-globe.png
150 ms
CBI-Cameron.jpg
244 ms
cbi-logo.png
239 ms
bpa-cover.jpg
241 ms
bpa-logo-white.png
254 ms
ehf-cover.jpg
252 ms
ehf-logo.png
377 ms
marketing.png
357 ms
ecommerce.png
358 ms
content.png
363 ms
communities.png
365 ms
collaboration.png
465 ms
kentico.png
548 ms
languages.json
175 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwlxdr.ttf
36 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i94_wlxdr.ttf
37 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf
84 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlxdr.ttf
87 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdr.ttf
88 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3iu4nwlxdr.ttf
86 ms
ga.js
24 ms
__utm.gif
16 ms
en.json
137 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
36 ms
revolution.extension.actions.min.js
34 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
36 ms
revolution.extension.parallax.min.js
34 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
40 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
20 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
21 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
21 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
209 ms
main.js
17 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf
11 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf
12 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf
12 ms
1px.png
118 ms
revicons.woff
14 ms
eSiteful_Logo_color.png
111 ms
translations-en.json
43 ms
esiteful.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
esiteful.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
esiteful.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Esiteful.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Esiteful.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
esiteful.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ESiteful. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: