Tools & Wizards About Us
essee.us screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

essee.us

eSSee Consulting: We Help Good People Do Great Things - Lean training, EHR implementation, and Performance Improvement Consulting - eSSee Consulting

Page Load Speed

25.9 sec in total

First Response

2.8 sec

Resources Loaded

22.8 sec

Page Rendered

346 ms

essee.us screenshot

About Website

Welcome to essee.us homepage info - get ready to check ESSee best content right away, or after learning these important things about essee.us

Consultancy that helps nursing home providers, assisted living facilities and aging services organizations improve performance and implement EHR technology.

Visit essee.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Essee.us page load time and found that the first response time was 2.8 sec and then it took 23.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

essee.us performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.0 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.021

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.4 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

essee.us

2770 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

67 ms

settings.css

193 ms

foundation.css

128 ms

app.css

252 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Essee.us, 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Maps.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.6 sec) relates to the external source Ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 584.4 kB (35%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Essee.us main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 995.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 29.1 kB

  • Original 37.3 kB
  • After minification 35.5 kB
  • After compression 8.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.1 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 324.8 kB

  • Original 995.7 kB
  • After minification 670.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, ESSee needs image optimization as it can save up to 324.8 kB or 33% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 145.0 kB

  • Original 439.7 kB
  • After minification 439.7 kB
  • After compression 294.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 145.0 kB or 33% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 85.4 kB

  • Original 204.5 kB
  • After minification 203.7 kB
  • After compression 119.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Essee.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 85.4 kB or 42% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (66%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ESSee. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

essee.us

essee.us

2770 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

67 ms

settings.css

settings.css

193 ms

foundation.css

foundation.css

128 ms

app.css

app.css

252 ms

selection.php

selection.php

273 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

131 ms

style.css

style.css

133 ms

js_composer.css

js_composer.css

323 ms

6eb86a46dba7b7014c3ca5b60295946fe81eecea.css

6eb86a46dba7b7014c3ca5b60295946fe81eecea.css

197 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

203 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

316 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

267 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

359 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

360 ms

js

js

78 ms

modernizr.custom.min.js

modernizr.custom.min.js

360 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

360 ms

devicepx-jetpack.js

devicepx-jetpack.js

15 ms

vendor.min.js

vendor.min.js

514 ms

app.min.js

app.min.js

392 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

390 ms

js_composer_front.js

js_composer_front.js

394 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

391 ms

e-202445.js

e-202445.js

3 ms

icons.css

icons.css

154 ms

css

css

23 ms

ga.js

ga.js

98 ms

q

q

58 ms

ir

ir

19557 ms

logo2.png

logo2.png

76 ms

logo_without_text.png

logo_without_text.png

74 ms

money_performance.png

money_performance.png

208 ms

EHR.png

EHR.png

207 ms

circle_lean.png

circle_lean.png

74 ms

Compass2.png

Compass2.png

208 ms

Innovation.jpg

Innovation.jpg

207 ms

Speed-and-Performance2.png

Speed-and-Performance2.png

207 ms

bg_footer.png

bg_footer.png

178 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHw.woff

17 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWA.woff

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWA.woff

19 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHw.woff

120 ms

fuelthemes.woff

fuelthemes.woff

201 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

42 ms

favicon.ico

favicon.ico

69 ms

Accessibility Review

essee.us accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

essee.us best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

essee.us SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Essee.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Essee.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

essee.us

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of ESSee. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: